Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
More than 300 persons have now retracted charges of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) based on "memories" recovered in psychotherapy. How may we understand their experience? Four of the five retractors from a selected telephone area code were interviewed with a procedure that gave them different possible explanations for what had occurred. The accounts of the retractors and their critique of different explanations are presented. Two of the retractors appear to have been subjected to a sort of "mind control," and two others appear to have become imaginatively involved in a narrative that sewed a defensive purpose. In all cases, the experiences of the retractors appeared to be determined more by the therapeutic situation than by characteristics of their personalities.
Psychological Inquiry – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.