The Nature of Rapport
Abstract
312 COMMENTARIES Duncan, S. D., Jr., Fiske, D. W., Denny, R., Kanki, B. G., & Mokros, H. rapport is to be commended. Like any important problem it B. (1985). Interaction structure and strategy. New York: Cambridge raises basic issues regarding one's conceptual and meth- University Press. odological models for the area. Describing action patterns Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co- reflecting rapport seems challenging but possible, perhaps occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in like a moon landing. Predicting the development of rapport is sociolinguistics (pp. 213-258). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Win- ston. quite another matter, more like traveling to another galaxy. Kanki, B. G. (1985). Participant differences and interactive strategies. In Note S. D. Duncan, Jr., D. W. Fiske, R. Denny, B. G. Kanki, & H. B. Mokros, Interaction structure and strategy (pp. 233-293). New York: Cambridge University Press. Starkey Duncan, Jr., Department of Psychology, Univer- Mokros, H. B. (1985). Patterns of persistence and change in action se- sity of Chicago, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, quences. In S. D. Duncan, Jr., D. W. Fiske, R. Denny, B. G. Kanki, & IL 60637. H. B. Mokros, Interaction structure and strategy