Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Political is Personal: Analyzing the Presidential Primary Debate Performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann

The Political is Personal: Analyzing the Presidential Primary Debate Performances of Hillary... This study draws attention to presidential primary debates, and particularly to those in which women candidates are beginning to play a more pivotal role. In this content analysis we compared debate performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann. Gendered communication strategies were examined to determine if women and men candidates differed in their performances during primary presidential debates. The study found party superseded gender in determining references to war, and Representative Bachmann employed personal experience more than Clinton, Democratic men, and Republican men. The lack of uniform influence on rhetorical choices suggests confounding factors that dictate candidate message construction, such as battles over political party identity. The potential implications for rhetorical strategies and gender within United States presidentiality are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Argumentation and Advocacy Taylor & Francis

The Political is Personal: Analyzing the Presidential Primary Debate Performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann

Argumentation and Advocacy , Volume 52 (3): 16 – Jan 1, 2016

The Political is Personal: Analyzing the Presidential Primary Debate Performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann

Abstract

This study draws attention to presidential primary debates, and particularly to those in which women candidates are beginning to play a more pivotal role. In this content analysis we compared debate performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann. Gendered communication strategies were examined to determine if women and men candidates differed in their performances during primary presidential debates. The study found party superseded gender in determining references to war, and...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-political-is-personal-analyzing-the-presidential-primary-debate-LeiADHhgXX
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2016 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2576-8476
eISSN
1051-1431
DOI
10.1080/00028533.2016.11821868
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study draws attention to presidential primary debates, and particularly to those in which women candidates are beginning to play a more pivotal role. In this content analysis we compared debate performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann. Gendered communication strategies were examined to determine if women and men candidates differed in their performances during primary presidential debates. The study found party superseded gender in determining references to war, and Representative Bachmann employed personal experience more than Clinton, Democratic men, and Republican men. The lack of uniform influence on rhetorical choices suggests confounding factors that dictate candidate message construction, such as battles over political party identity. The potential implications for rhetorical strategies and gender within United States presidentiality are discussed.

Journal

Argumentation and AdvocacyTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 2016

Keywords: women candidates; presidential primary debates; feminine style; masculine style

References