Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE OF FANTASY'S TRAVERSAL

THE UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE OF FANTASY'S TRAVERSAL AbstractThis essay seeks to go beyond the arguments of Lee Edelman's 2004 No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Edelman's book uses Jacques Lacan's theory of the sinthome to critique the homophobic ideology of reproductive futurism, which seeks to guarantee the future in the name of the child. Edelman uses Lacan to argue that queer theory should forgo any engagement with a politics of the future, and that queers should instead embrace the position of the reviled sinthomosexual, whose embrace of jouissance in the Real undercuts reprofuturity. By contrast, this essay offers an alternative interpretation of Lacan's theory of the sinthome that sustains several productive accounts of a future that could lie beyond the fantasy of reproductive futurism – options that are far more promising for queer theory than Edelman's refusal of all politics and signification. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities Taylor & Francis

THE UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE OF FANTASY'S TRAVERSAL

Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities , Volume 18 (4): 19 – Dec 1, 2013

THE UNPREDICTABLE FUTURE OF FANTASY'S TRAVERSAL

Abstract

AbstractThis essay seeks to go beyond the arguments of Lee Edelman's 2004 No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Edelman's book uses Jacques Lacan's theory of the sinthome to critique the homophobic ideology of reproductive futurism, which seeks to guarantee the future in the name of the child. Edelman uses Lacan to argue that queer theory should forgo any engagement with a politics of the future, and that queers should instead embrace the position of the reviled...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-unpredictable-future-of-fantasy-apos-s-traversal-9IzzU8jlSi
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2014 Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1469-2899
eISSN
0969-725X
DOI
10.1080/0969725X.2013.869023
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThis essay seeks to go beyond the arguments of Lee Edelman's 2004 No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Edelman's book uses Jacques Lacan's theory of the sinthome to critique the homophobic ideology of reproductive futurism, which seeks to guarantee the future in the name of the child. Edelman uses Lacan to argue that queer theory should forgo any engagement with a politics of the future, and that queers should instead embrace the position of the reviled sinthomosexual, whose embrace of jouissance in the Real undercuts reprofuturity. By contrast, this essay offers an alternative interpretation of Lacan's theory of the sinthome that sustains several productive accounts of a future that could lie beyond the fantasy of reproductive futurism – options that are far more promising for queer theory than Edelman's refusal of all politics and signification.

Journal

Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical HumanitiesTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 2013

Keywords:  psychoanalysis; queer theory; sinthome; temporality; Edelman; Lee; Lacan; Jacques

References