Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Robertson, J. Milner (1987)
An Inconsistency Scale for the Child Abuse Potential InventoryPsychological Reports, 60
D. Pruitt, Marilyn Erickson (1985)
The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: a study of concurrent validity.Journal of clinical psychology, 41 1
C. Ayoub, M. Jacewitz, R. Gold, J. Milner (1983)
Assessment of a program's effectiveness in selecting individuals "at risk" for problems in parenting.Journal of clinical psychology, 39 3
J. Milner (1994)
Assessing physical child abuse risk: The child abuse potential inventoryClinical Psychology Review, 14
K. Robertson, J. Milner (1985)
Convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of personality assessment, 49 1
J. Milner, R. Wimberley (1980)
Prediction and explanation of child abuse.Journal of clinical psychology, 36 4
J. Milner, K. Robertson (1989)
Inconsistent response patterns and the prediction of child maltreatment.Child abuse & neglect, 13 1
J. Milner, C. Ayoub (1980)
Evaluation of "at risk" parents using the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of clinical psychology, 36 4
J. Milner (1989)
Additional cross-validation of the child abuse potential inventoryPsychological Assessment, 1
Evanell Thomasson, S. Minor, David McCord, Trudy Berkovitz, Glen Cassle, J. Milner (1981)
Evaluation of a family life education program for rural high‐risk families: A research noteJournal of Community Psychology, 9
J. Robitaille, E. Jones, R. Gold, K. Robertson, J. Milner (1985)
Child abuse potential and authoritarianism.Journal of clinical psychology, 41 6
J. Milner, J. Charlesworth, R. Gold, S. Gold, M. Friesen (1983)
Convergent validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of clinical psychology, 44 2
J. Milner, K. Robertson (1985)
Development of a random response scale for the child abuse potential inventory.Journal of clinical psychology, 41 5
J. Milner (1982)
Development of a Lie Scale for the Child Abuse Potential InventoryPsychological Reports, 50
R. Ellis, J. Milner (1981)
Child Abuse and Locus of ControlPsychological Reports, 48
M. Arruabarrena, J. Paúl (1992)
Validez convergente de la versión Española preliminar del Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Depresión y ajuste marital.Child Abuse & Neglect, 16
J. Paúl, I. Arruabarrena, J. Milner (1991)
Validación de una versión española del child abuse potential inventory para su uso en EspañaChild Abuse & Neglect, 15
W. Dahlstom, GEORGE Welsh (1961)
An MMPI handbook : a guide to use in clinical practice and researchThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 241
María Madariaga, J. Paúl, Ramón Muñoz, Bárbara Torres (1991)
Tratamiento de familias con problemas de maltrato y/o abandono infantil
David Nichols, Roger Greene, Peter Schmolck (1989)
Criteria for assessing inconsistent patterns of item endorsement on the MMPI: rationale, development, and empirical trials.Journal of clinical psychology, 45 2
J. Milner, R. Wimberley (1979)
An inventory for the identification of child abusers.Journal of clinical psychology, 35 1
J. Milner, R. Gold, R. Wimberley (1986)
Prediction and explanation of child abuse: cross-validation of the child abuse potential inventory.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 54 6
S. Stringer, A. Greca (1985)
Correlates of child abuse potentialJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13
J. Paúl, A. Martin (1992)
Versión española del inventario child abuse potential: validez convergente y apoyo social, 45
J. Milner, Julie Crouch (1997)
Impact and detection of response distortions on parenting measures used to assess risk for child physical abuse.Journal of personality assessment, 69 3
ResumenEste estudio tuvo como objetivo realizar la adaptación y validación del Child Abuse Potential Inventory para su utilización en España. El Inventario CAP fue diseñado para evaluar el riesgo potencial que presenta un sujeto para perpetrar acciones de maltrato físico infantil. Consta de 160 items, agrupados en cuatro escalas: Abuso, Deseabilidad Social, Respuesta al Azar e Inconsistencia. Tras varios estudios preliminares en España, se procedió a su validación, aplicándolo a una muestra de 920 sujetos. La Escala de Respuesta al Azar fue modificada y quedó constituida por 12 items. La Escala de Deseabilidad Social, quedó compuesta por 10 items. Para realizar la validación de la Escala de Abuso se crearon dos grupos emparejados en las variables sociodemográficas: maltratadores físicos y población general. Se seleccionaron 73 items que discriminaban de manera estadísticamente significativa entre ambos grupos. Los análisis de regresión logística realizados con esta Escala de 73 items proporcionan porcentajes de clasificación correcta del 92.4%. Las puntuaciones directas de esta Escala proporcionan un porcentaje de clasificación correcta de sujetos maltratadores físicos y sujetos de la población general del 84.1%.
Studies in Psychology: Estudios de Psicología – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Keywords: Maltrato Infantil; evaluación; prevención; alto-riesgo; Child abuse; assessment; prevention; high-risk
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.