Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Visual estimation of blood loss versus quantitative blood loss for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage

Visual estimation of blood loss versus quantitative blood loss for maternal outcomes related to... Abstract Background This study was undertaken to evaluate if there are differences between visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) and quantitative blood loss (QBL) for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage. Methods This retrospective study compared EBL (n = 500) to QBL (n = 501) for outcomes of length of stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, percent receiving blood transfusions, time between delivery to receiving blood transfusion, and postpartum hemoglobin level. Results The QBL group had a significantly lower mean length of stay than the EBL group (2.6 vs 3.2 days, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis adjusting for relevant covariates had a similar finding of lower length of stay for QBL vs EBL (B = −0.13, SE = 0.01, P < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days, blood transfusion, time to transfusion since delivery, and postpartum hemoglobin did not significantly differ between the QBL and EBL groups. Conclusion We recommend that clinicians adopt QBL over EBL as standard practice since QBL is associated with lower length of stay and does not negatively impact other clinical outcomes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Taylor & Francis

Visual estimation of blood loss versus quantitative blood loss for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage

5 pages

Visual estimation of blood loss versus quantitative blood loss for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage

Abstract

Abstract Background This study was undertaken to evaluate if there are differences between visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) and quantitative blood loss (QBL) for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage. Methods This retrospective study compared EBL (n = 500) to QBL (n = 501) for outcomes of length of stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, percent receiving blood transfusions, time between delivery to receiving blood transfusion, and...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/visual-estimation-of-blood-loss-versus-quantitative-blood-loss-for-vubRiF7aa0
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Baylor University Medical Center
ISSN
1525-3252
eISSN
0899-8280
DOI
10.1080/08998280.2023.2187248
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Background This study was undertaken to evaluate if there are differences between visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) and quantitative blood loss (QBL) for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage. Methods This retrospective study compared EBL (n = 500) to QBL (n = 501) for outcomes of length of stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, percent receiving blood transfusions, time between delivery to receiving blood transfusion, and postpartum hemoglobin level. Results The QBL group had a significantly lower mean length of stay than the EBL group (2.6 vs 3.2 days, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis adjusting for relevant covariates had a similar finding of lower length of stay for QBL vs EBL (B = −0.13, SE = 0.01, P < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days, blood transfusion, time to transfusion since delivery, and postpartum hemoglobin did not significantly differ between the QBL and EBL groups. Conclusion We recommend that clinicians adopt QBL over EBL as standard practice since QBL is associated with lower length of stay and does not negatively impact other clinical outcomes.

Journal

Baylor University Medical Center ProceedingsTaylor & Francis

Published: May 4, 2023

Keywords: Delivery; length of stay; obstetrics; postpartum hemorrhage

References