Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry

What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging... A critical turn is currently taking place in interpersonal and family communication (IFC) studies, thereby reorienting the predominantly post-positivist, rationalist, and individualist sensibilities that have long characterized the sub-field. However, questions remain about what counts – or not – as critical interpersonal and family communication (CIFC) inquiry. In this review essay, we first critique historical definitions of IFC. Second, we characterize the few recent instances of meta-communication about CIFC as lacking a coherent vision. Third, we distinguish IFC from CIFC in terms of study topics and metatheoretical commitments. Fourth, we advocate for a more inclusive yet nuanced understanding of what counts by delimiting CIFC studies as a multiplicity of politics. Finally, we offer future recommendations for this area of inquiry. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of the International Communication Association Taylor & Francis

What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry

What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry

Abstract

A critical turn is currently taking place in interpersonal and family communication (IFC) studies, thereby reorienting the predominantly post-positivist, rationalist, and individualist sensibilities that have long characterized the sub-field. However, questions remain about what counts – or not – as critical interpersonal and family communication (CIFC) inquiry. In this review essay, we first critique historical definitions of IFC. Second, we characterize the few recent instances...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/what-counts-as-critical-interpersonal-and-family-communication-J8cUAlK0RY
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2019 International Communication Association
ISSN
2380-8977
eISSN
2380-8985
DOI
10.1080/23808985.2019.1570825
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A critical turn is currently taking place in interpersonal and family communication (IFC) studies, thereby reorienting the predominantly post-positivist, rationalist, and individualist sensibilities that have long characterized the sub-field. However, questions remain about what counts – or not – as critical interpersonal and family communication (CIFC) inquiry. In this review essay, we first critique historical definitions of IFC. Second, we characterize the few recent instances of meta-communication about CIFC as lacking a coherent vision. Third, we distinguish IFC from CIFC in terms of study topics and metatheoretical commitments. Fourth, we advocate for a more inclusive yet nuanced understanding of what counts by delimiting CIFC studies as a multiplicity of politics. Finally, we offer future recommendations for this area of inquiry.

Journal

Annals of the International Communication AssociationTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2019

Keywords: Critical interpersonal and family communication (CIFC); inclusivity; methodology; politics; theory

References