Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Baumgartner, B. Jones (1993)
Agendas and instability in American politics
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12:201–202, 2007 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1087-1209 print / 1533-158X online DOI: 10.1080/10871200701323181 UHDW 1 1 H Hu 087 533 um ma - - a1 1 n n 209 58X Di Dim me en ns si io on ns s o of f W Wi il ld dl li ife fe, Vol. 12, No. 3, April 2007: pp. 1–4 Wildlife Ballot Initiatives in California and Colorado: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model Explanation W C.ild Bu lif rn ee Ba tt llot Initiatives in California and Colorado CHRISTOPHER BURNETT Department of Journalism, California State University, Long Beach, California, USA In the wildlife policy arena, ballot initiatives have been used increasingly over the past two decades to wrest control of policy from legislators and bureaucrats. This trend has led to some dramatic changes in policy as professionals are forced to adapt to changing politi- cal winds. This findings abstract assesses the role of ballot initiatives as a precipitator of policy change for hunting in California and Colorado. The theoretical foundation rests on policy-change research using a punctuated equi- librium policy model developed by political scientists Baumgartner and Jones (1993, 2002). This model focuses on
Human Dimensions of Wildlife – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jun 4, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.