Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Are Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades Effective? An Empirical Analysis in Southern California

Are Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades Effective? An Empirical Analysis in Southern California We analyze multiple subsidy programs for residential energy efficiency upgrades from 2010 to 2015 using electricity billing records of more than 11 million households in Southern California. We find that adopting these upgrades reduces overall electricity usage by 4%. However, there are significant differences in savings between upgrades. Pool pump and refrigeration upgrades generate the largest savings (13% and 6%, respectively). Lighting and HVAC retrofits generate the smallest savings (less than 1%). Some upgrades lead to concerns of rebound effects, such as dishwasher and clothes washer upgrades, and building envelope upgrades. Program impact varies by time of the year and building type. Furthermore, we find that energy savings are inconsistent with the engineering estimates. These results indicate that policy makers should consider the allocation of program funding not simply based on engineering projections but also based on measured electricity consumption such as those described in this study. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists University of Chicago Press

Are Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades Effective? An Empirical Analysis in Southern California

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-chicago-press/are-residential-energy-efficiency-upgrades-effective-an-empirical-oZ3CJGWAUc
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Copyright
© 2022 The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2333-5955
eISSN
2333-5963
DOI
10.1086/718529
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We analyze multiple subsidy programs for residential energy efficiency upgrades from 2010 to 2015 using electricity billing records of more than 11 million households in Southern California. We find that adopting these upgrades reduces overall electricity usage by 4%. However, there are significant differences in savings between upgrades. Pool pump and refrigeration upgrades generate the largest savings (13% and 6%, respectively). Lighting and HVAC retrofits generate the smallest savings (less than 1%). Some upgrades lead to concerns of rebound effects, such as dishwasher and clothes washer upgrades, and building envelope upgrades. Program impact varies by time of the year and building type. Furthermore, we find that energy savings are inconsistent with the engineering estimates. These results indicate that policy makers should consider the allocation of program funding not simply based on engineering projections but also based on measured electricity consumption such as those described in this study.

Journal

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsUniversity of Chicago Press

Published: Jul 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.