Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Climate-Related Natural Disasters and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Environmental Legislation in the US Senate

Climate-Related Natural Disasters and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Environmental Legislation in... This study investigates whether US senators are more likely to vote in favor of environmentally friendly legislation following damages caused by climate-related natural disasters. We combine senatorial scores of roll call votes on environmental legislation with modeled state-level human and economic natural disaster losses over a 44-year period. Our results show that support for environmental legislation increases in response to unusual human losses but does not respond to unusual economic losses. We also find that the documented response to natural disasters is two years and relatively short-lived. Geography, constituent partisanship, local economic conditions, and senatorial experience affect the magnitude and precision of the treatment effect. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists University of Chicago Press

Climate-Related Natural Disasters and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Environmental Legislation in the US Senate

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-chicago-press/climate-related-natural-disasters-and-voting-behavior-evidence-from-3U4hNg8R22
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Copyright
© 2023 The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2333-5955
eISSN
2333-5963
DOI
10.1086/722540
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study investigates whether US senators are more likely to vote in favor of environmentally friendly legislation following damages caused by climate-related natural disasters. We combine senatorial scores of roll call votes on environmental legislation with modeled state-level human and economic natural disaster losses over a 44-year period. Our results show that support for environmental legislation increases in response to unusual human losses but does not respond to unusual economic losses. We also find that the documented response to natural disasters is two years and relatively short-lived. Geography, constituent partisanship, local economic conditions, and senatorial experience affect the magnitude and precision of the treatment effect.

Journal

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsUniversity of Chicago Press

Published: May 1, 2023

There are no references for this article.