Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
We analyze a competitive fishery with congestion in which each skipper is privately informed about fish abundance, and we study the broader implications for the entire fishery. Harvest strategies are shown to depend on congestion, the number of vessels, fishers’ prior information, and the precision of their signal. As information signals are valuable, fishers have incentives to share them despite congestion costs. Yet, this cooperative behavior tends to increase aggregate harvests but also makes it harder for fishery managers to predict harvests. The existence of information sharing (IS) is not independent of the existing policy framework, and new policy measures aimed at reducing harvests can trigger IS and, ultimately, result in higher fish mortality. The strategic release by the manager of abundance information changes fishing effort and, hence, can become a policy tool through which harvests can be lowered. Finally, we investigate the implications of having several IS groups.
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists – University of Chicago Press
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.