Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Gone with the Wind? An Empirical Analysis of the Equilibrium Impact of Renewable Energy

Gone with the Wind? An Empirical Analysis of the Equilibrium Impact of Renewable Energy What are the final equilibrium impacts of renewable energy investments on consumer and producer surpluses? This paper offers an approach to quantify the surplus breakdown in a market dominated by renewables and sufficient storage to counterbalance their intermittency—the Nordic electricity market. Wind power entry has strong distributional impacts: 10% market share for wind generation changes the consumer side surplus by an amount that is equivalent to a 40% decline in expenditures, at the cost of incumbents’ surplus. The surplus transfer is big enough to cover the cost of subsidizing entry. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists University of Chicago Press

Gone with the Wind? An Empirical Analysis of the Equilibrium Impact of Renewable Energy

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-chicago-press/gone-with-the-wind-an-empirical-analysis-of-the-equilibrium-impact-of-pgiKSrqAiH
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Copyright
© 2020 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2333-5955
eISSN
2333-5963
DOI
10.1086/709648
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

What are the final equilibrium impacts of renewable energy investments on consumer and producer surpluses? This paper offers an approach to quantify the surplus breakdown in a market dominated by renewables and sufficient storage to counterbalance their intermittency—the Nordic electricity market. Wind power entry has strong distributional impacts: 10% market share for wind generation changes the consumer side surplus by an amount that is equivalent to a 40% decline in expenditures, at the cost of incumbents’ surplus. The surplus transfer is big enough to cover the cost of subsidizing entry.

Journal

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsUniversity of Chicago Press

Published: Sep 1, 2020

There are no references for this article.