Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Disagreements about normative aspects of social time preferences have led to estimates of the social cost of carbon (SCC) that differ by orders of magnitude. We investigate how disagreements about the SCC change if planners are nondogmatic, that is, they admit the possibility of a change in their normative views and internalize the preferences of future selves. Although nondogmatic planners may disagree about all the contentious aspects of social time preferences, disagreements about the SCC reduce dramatically. Admitting the possibility of a change in views once every 40 years results in a fivefold reduction in the range of recommended SCCs.
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists – University of Chicago Press
Published: Jul 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.