Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
That modern states make use of legibility projects to exert social control is widely acknowledged. Much less understood is how state actors resolve crisis situations that severely undermine and disincentivize the use of legibility. These are situations in which public officials confront rapid declines in budgetary resources at the exact same time that new legal rules or pressure forces them to expand access to services. In order to understand what officials do in such situations, this article explores how the policy crisis of Prison Realignment in Los Angeles County—the shift of thousands of California state prisoners into an already overcrowded county jail system—came to be considered publicly resolved. This article introduces the concept of “administrative disappearing,” or the process by which contradictory information embedded within legibility projects is reconfigured into state assets. These contradictions refer to the faulty aggregations, contextually insensitive standards, and incommensurable policy metrics that, during crisis, come to be highlighted and productively used to resolve material threats to the state.
American Journal of Sociology – University of Chicago Press
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.