Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Song Remains Not the Same: Correlated Intercept and Slope Uncertainties Matter to Prices versus Quantities

The Song Remains Not the Same: Correlated Intercept and Slope Uncertainties Matter to Prices... Weitzman’s “relative slope rule” (RSR) is a rule of thumb for determining the relative efficiency of quantity versus price instruments to regulate firms under asymmetric information. This rule identifies the more efficient instrument based on the relative slopes of the marginal benefit and cost functions. The RSR relies on three key assumptions: the unknown cost and benefit functions are well represented by second-order approximations, the regulator’s uncertainty is confined to the intercepts of the linearized marginal functions, and these intercepts are not correlated. Subsequent work has adopted these assumptions as the default case and found the RSR to be robust, although Malcomson showed the RSR may break down when the marginal cost function’s intercept and slope are both uncertain and correlated. We provide theoretical support for the presence of this correlated uncertainty and, using numerical examples, show the relative slope rule may be in error in this setting. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists University of Chicago Press

The Song Remains Not the Same: Correlated Intercept and Slope Uncertainties Matter to Prices versus Quantities

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-chicago-press/the-song-remains-not-the-same-correlated-intercept-and-slope-GDOiy504Ty
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Copyright
© 2021 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2333-5955
eISSN
2333-5963
DOI
10.1086/712418
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Weitzman’s “relative slope rule” (RSR) is a rule of thumb for determining the relative efficiency of quantity versus price instruments to regulate firms under asymmetric information. This rule identifies the more efficient instrument based on the relative slopes of the marginal benefit and cost functions. The RSR relies on three key assumptions: the unknown cost and benefit functions are well represented by second-order approximations, the regulator’s uncertainty is confined to the intercepts of the linearized marginal functions, and these intercepts are not correlated. Subsequent work has adopted these assumptions as the default case and found the RSR to be robust, although Malcomson showed the RSR may break down when the marginal cost function’s intercept and slope are both uncertain and correlated. We provide theoretical support for the presence of this correlated uncertainty and, using numerical examples, show the relative slope rule may be in error in this setting.

Journal

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsUniversity of Chicago Press

Published: Jul 1, 2021

There are no references for this article.