Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editorial

Editorial Change Over Time ED I T O R IA L F R A N K M A T E R O Editor in Chief Figure 1. A fitting critique, intentional or not, on the impossible task of reintegrating that which is lost. Even if the tangible realities of heritage can be called forth, the question remains what of the intangible values a loss of integrity creates and how can those be ‘compensated.’ Photo by Kecia Fong, 2005. 88 As this issue goes to print, a groundswell of interest, or more accurately, critique and rejection of the long- seated definition and application of its subject, integrity, is underway. As part of the broader global movement addressing social justice and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion, a reconsideration of what historic integrity means for the identifica - tion, protection, and preservation of significant cultural places is long overdue. That is not to say that challenges to the existing concepts of significance and integrity were not being voiced e arlier in academic and professional circles. But it remained a polite conversation, with any drama confined behind closed doors. That was until 2020, when the demands for social justice, equity, and inclusive repre sen http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Change Over Time University of Pennsylvania Press

Editorial

Change Over Time , Volume 10 (2): 5 – May 17, 2022
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-pennsylvania-press/editorial-vqsFsOMgDB
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Copyright
Copyright © University of Pennsylvania Press
ISSN
2153-0548
DOI
10.1353/cot.2021.0009

Abstract

Change Over Time ED I T O R IA L F R A N K M A T E R O Editor in Chief Figure 1. A fitting critique, intentional or not, on the impossible task of reintegrating that which is lost. Even if the tangible realities of heritage can be called forth, the question remains what of the intangible values a loss of integrity creates and how can those be ‘compensated.’ Photo by Kecia Fong, 2005. 88 As this issue goes to print, a groundswell of interest, or more accurately, critique and rejection of the long- seated definition and application of its subject, integrity, is underway. As part of the broader global movement addressing social justice and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion, a reconsideration of what historic integrity means for the identifica - tion, protection, and preservation of significant cultural places is long overdue. That is not to say that challenges to the existing concepts of significance and integrity were not being voiced e arlier in academic and professional circles. But it remained a polite conversation, with any drama confined behind closed doors. That was until 2020, when the demands for social justice, equity, and inclusive repre sen

Journal

Change Over Time – University of Pennsylvania Press

Published: May 17, 2022

There are no references for this article.