Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A moderated mediation effect of symbolic and substantive preventive actions on employees’ preventive behavior in the context of Covid‐19

A moderated mediation effect of symbolic and substantive preventive actions on employees’... This study utilizes Social Information Processing (SIP) theory to investigate the relationship between organizational preventive actions (substantive vs. symbolic), employee preventive behavior, the mediating role of conspiracy beliefs, and moderating role of leadership integrity in the context of Covid‐19. The study explains leadership integrity as a boundary condition to facilitate or hinder the mediated relationship between organizational actions and employee preventive behavior (EPB). The hypothesized model was tested using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) on two‐wave data collected from 281 respondents. The results revealed that substantive actions do not predict EPB directly but through conspiracy beliefs. Contrary to these, symbolic actions negatively predict EPB directly. Leadership integrity moderates the relationship between substantive actions and conspiracy beliefs, while the interaction effect with symbolic actions is not supported. The findings of this study caution managers to walk their talk because employees critically observe the most apparent actions, especially when management fails to practice them. The study contributes to social information processing theory by pointing to leadership integrity as a source of authenticity to curb the negative impact of symbolic actions and catalyst the effect of substantive actions on employee preventive behavior. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Wiley

A moderated mediation effect of symbolic and substantive preventive actions on employees’ preventive behavior in the context of Covid‐19

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/a-moderated-mediation-effect-of-symbolic-and-substantive-preventive-mSlRzW0uhi

References (96)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.
ISSN
1529-7489
eISSN
1530-2415
DOI
10.1111/asap.12337
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study utilizes Social Information Processing (SIP) theory to investigate the relationship between organizational preventive actions (substantive vs. symbolic), employee preventive behavior, the mediating role of conspiracy beliefs, and moderating role of leadership integrity in the context of Covid‐19. The study explains leadership integrity as a boundary condition to facilitate or hinder the mediated relationship between organizational actions and employee preventive behavior (EPB). The hypothesized model was tested using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) on two‐wave data collected from 281 respondents. The results revealed that substantive actions do not predict EPB directly but through conspiracy beliefs. Contrary to these, symbolic actions negatively predict EPB directly. Leadership integrity moderates the relationship between substantive actions and conspiracy beliefs, while the interaction effect with symbolic actions is not supported. The findings of this study caution managers to walk their talk because employees critically observe the most apparent actions, especially when management fails to practice them. The study contributes to social information processing theory by pointing to leadership integrity as a source of authenticity to curb the negative impact of symbolic actions and catalyst the effect of substantive actions on employee preventive behavior.

Journal

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyWiley

Published: Apr 1, 2023

Keywords: conspiracy beliefs; Covid‐19; employee preventive behavior; leader's integrity; social information processing theory (SIP)

There are no references for this article.