Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/an-effective-approach-to-the-repeated-cross-sectional-design-qhc0iBOegr
References (69)
-
N. Stroud (2008)
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective ExposurePolitical Behavior, 30
-
H. Hurst (1951)
Long-Term Storage Capacity of ReservoirsTransactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 116
-
Boris Shor, Joseph Bafumi, L. Keele, David Park (2007)
A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional DataPolitical Analysis, 15
-
Sean Carey, Matthew Lebo (2006)
Election Cycles and the Economic VoterPolitical Research Quarterly, 59
-
L. Gil‐Alana (2007)
Fractional integration and structural breaks at unknown periods of timeJournal of Time Series Analysis, 29
-
C. Granger (1980)
Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic modelsJournal of Econometrics, 14
-
(2006)
Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models -
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (1995)
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section DataAmerican Political Science Review, 89
-
Christopher Kenny, Michael Mcburnett (1992)
A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Campaign Spending on Congressional Vote ChoiceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 36
-
Lisa Blaydes, Eric Chaney (2013)
The Feudal Revolution and Europe's Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CEAmerican Political Science Review, 107
-
David Byers, J. Davidson, D. Peel (2000)
The dynamics of aggregate political popularity: evidence from eight countriesElectoral Studies, 19
-
MacKuen MacKuen, Erikson Erikson, Stimson Stimson (1989)
MacropartisanshipAmerican Political Science Review, 83
-
A. Gelman (2008)
Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do -
James Honaker, Gary King (2010)
What to Do about Missing Values in Time‐Series Cross‐Section DataAmerican Journal of Political Science, 54
-
J. Patty (2008)
Equilibrium Party GovernmentAmerican Journal of Political Science, 52
-
Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas, T. Bolsen (2006)
Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information EnvironmentAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
-
D. Romer (2006)
Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004 : the national Annenberg election survey -
G. Box, G. Jenkins (1971)
Time series analysis, forecasting and control -
K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (1997)
Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting -
Patricia Moy, Michael Xenos, Verena Hess (2006)
Priming Effects of Late-Night ComedyInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18
-
J. Segal, H. Spaeth (1993)
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited -
Wen-Jen Tsay, C. Chung (2000)
The spurious regression of fractionally integrated processesJournal of Econometrics, 96
-
R. Lau, David Andersen, David Redlawsk (2008)
An Exploration of Correct Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 52
-
H. Clarke, Matthew Lebo (2003)
Fractional (Co)integration and Governing Party Support in BritainBritish Journal of Political Science, 33
-
Joseph Bafumi, A. Gelman (2007)
Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects CorrelateEconometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - General eJournal
-
E. Voeten (2008)
The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human RightsAmerican Political Science Review, 102
-
Clarke Clarke, Stewart Stewart, Ault Ault, Elliott Elliott (2005)
Men, Women and the Political Economy of Presidential ApprovalBritish Journal of Political Science, 35
-
Nathaniel Beck (2007)
From Statistical Nuisances to Serious Modeling: Changing How We Think About the Analysis of Time-Series—Cross-Section DataPolitical Analysis, 15
-
Brandon Bartels (2009)
The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review, 103
-
Joseph Bafumi (2011)
Animal spirits: the effect of economic expectations on economic outputApplied Economics, 43
-
J. Box-Steffensmeier, David Darmofal, C. Farrell (2009)
The Aggregate Dynamics of CampaignsThe Journal of Politics, 71
-
L. Keele, N. Kelly (2006)
Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent VariablesPolitical Analysis, 14
-
C. Granger, P. Newbold (1974)
Spurious regressions in econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 2
-
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan Katz (2004)
Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo ExperimentsPolitical Analysis, 15
-
Michael Mackuen, Robert Erikson, James Stimson (1992)
Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. EconomyAmerican Political Science Review, 86
-
G. Kramer (1983)
The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 77
-
D. Greenberg (2001)
On Theory, Models, Model-Testing, and EstimationJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 17
-
L. Stoker, M. Jennings (2008)
Of Time and the Development of Partisan PolarizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 52
-
Jennifer Jerit (2012)
Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information EnvironmentThe Journal of Politics, 74
-
W. Enders (1994)
Applied Econometric Time SeriesTechnometrics, 46
-
J. Zaller (1992)
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Contents -
J. Wooldridge (2003)
Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data -
W. Mishler, Reginald Sheehan (1996)
Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic PerspectiveThe Journal of Politics, 58
-
A. Skrondal, S. Rabe-Hesketh (2004)
Generalized latent variable models: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models -
Matthew Lebo, Adam McGlynn, Gregory Koger (2007)
Strategic Party Government: Party Influence in Congress, 1789–2000American Journal of Political Science, 51
-
P. Freedman, Michael Franz, K. Goldstein (2004)
Campaign Advertising and Democratic CitizenshipAmerican Journal of Political Science, 48
-
D. Green, I. Shapiro (1994)
Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science -
Robert Erikson, Gerald Wright, John McIver (1989)
Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United StatesAmerican Political Science Review, 83
-
P. Lazarsfeld, B. Berelson, Hazel Gaudet (1968)
The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign -
T. DiPrete, D. Grusky (1988)
The Multilevel Analysis of Trends with Repeated Cross-Sectional DataSociological Methodology, 20
-
M. Dickinson, Matthew Lebo (2007)
Reexamining the Growth of the Institutional Presidency, 1940–2000The Journal of Politics, 69
-
K. Kenski, Bruce Hardy, K. Jamieson (2010)
The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election -
Mark Hurwitz, D. Lanier (2004)
I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888-1999Review of Policy Research, 21
-
B. Wood (2009)
The Myth of Presidential Representation -
George Krause (1997)
Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic ExpectationsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
-
P. Newbold, C. Granger (2001)
Essays in Econometrics: Spurious Regression in Econometrics -
Hopkins Hopkins (2012)
Whose Economy? Perceptions of National Economic Performance during Unequal GrowthPublic Opinion Quarterly, 76
-
M. Steenbergen, Bradford Jones (2002)
Modeling Multilevel Data StructuresAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
-
Richard Johnston, Henry Brady, J. Vowles (2006)
Capturing Campaign Effects -
Matthew Lebo, R. Walker, H. Clarke (2000)
You must remember this: dealing with long memory in political analysesElectoral Studies, 19
-
Suzanna Boef, Paul Kellstedt (2004)
The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidenceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 48
-
H. Clarke, Marianne Stewart, Michael Ault, Euel Elliott (2005)
Men, women and the dynamics of presidential approvalBritish Journal of Political Science, 35
-
D. Hopkins (2011)
Whose Economy? Perceptions of National Economic Performance During Unequal GrowthERN: Behavioral Economics (Topic)
-
J. Box-Steffensmeier, Suzanna Boef, Tse-min Lin (2004)
The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender GapAmerican Political Science Review, 98
-
J. Box-Steffensmeier, Renée Smith (1998)
Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration MethodsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 42
-
David Brown, A. Mobarak (2009)
The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of ElectricityAmerican Political Science Review, 103
-
A. Gelman, J. Hill (2006)
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models: Linear regression: the basics -
J. Box-Steffensmeier, Renée Smith (1996)
The Dynamics of Aggregate PartisanshipAmerican Political Science Review, 90
-
Brandice Canes-Wrone, D. Brady, J. Cogan (2002)
Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 96
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- ©2015 by the Midwest Political Science Association
- ISSN
- 0092-5853
- eISSN
- 1540-5907
- DOI
- 10.1111/ajps.12095
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Repeated cross‐sectional (RCS) designs are distinguishable from true panels and pooled cross‐sectional time series (PCSTS) since cross‐sectional units (e.g., individual survey respondents) appear but once in the data. This poses two serious challenges. First, as with PCSTS, autocorrelation threatens inferences. However, common solutions like differencing and using a lagged dependent variable are not possible with RCS since lags for i cannot be used. Second, although RCS designs contain information that allows both aggregate‐ and individual‐level analyses, available methods—from pooled ordinary least squares to PCSTS to time series—force researchers to choose one level of analysis. The PCSTS tool kit does not provide an appropriate solution, and we offer one here: double filtering with ARFIMA methods to account for autocorrelation in longer RCS followed by the use of multilevel modeling to estimate both aggregate‐ and individual‐level parameters simultaneously. We use Monte Carlo experiments and three applied examples to explore the advantages of our framework.
Journal
American Journal of Political Science – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2015