Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Jehiel, B. Moldovanu, E. Stacchetti (1996)
How (not) to sell nuclear weaponsThe American Economic Review, 86
Eric Gould, B. (Deceased), Canice Prendergast (2002)
Contracts, Externalities, and Incentives in Shopping MallsReview of Economics and Statistics, 87
P. Jehiel, B. Moldovanu, E. Stacchetti (1999)
Multidimensional Mechanism Design for Auctions with ExternalitiesJournal of Economic Theory, 85
I. Segal (1997)
Contracting with ExternalitiesMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
R. Myerson (1981)
Optimal Auction DesignMath. Oper. Res., 6
P. Jehiel, B. Moldovanu (2001)
Efficient Design with Interdependent ValuationsEconometrica, 69
Paul Milgrom, I. Segal (2002)
Envelope Theorems for Arbitrary Choice SetsEconometrica, 70
Jonathan Levin (1997)
An Optimal Auction for ComplementsGames and Economic Behavior, 18
Gopal Varma (2002)
Standard Auctions with Identity-Dependent ExternalitiesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 33
B. Pashigian, Eric Gould (1998)
Internalizing Externalities: the Pricing of Space in Shopping Malls1The Journal of Law and Economics, 41
E. Maskin, J. Riley, F. Hahn (1989)
Optimal Multi-Unit Auctions
J. Brueckner (1993)
Inter-store externalities and space allocation in shopping centersThe Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 7
B. Pashigian, Eric Gould (1998)
Contracts, Externalities, and Incentives in Shopping Malls: An Empirical Analysis
(2001)
Optimal Monopolistic Selling under Uncertainty: Does Price
N. Figueroa, Vasiliki Skreta (2007)
The Role of Outside Options in Auction DesignMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
P. Jehiel, B. Moldovanu (2000)
Auctions with Downstream Interaction Among BuyersThe RAND Journal of Economics, 31
Segal Segal (1999)
Contracting with ExternalitiesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 114
We analyze the problem of a seller of multiple identical units of a good who faces a set of buyers with unit demands, private information, and identity‐dependent externalities. We derive the seller's optimal mechanism and characterize its main properties. We show that the probability that a buyer obtains a unit is an increasing function of the externalities he generates and enjoys. Also, the seller's allocation of the units of the good need not be ex post efficient. As an illustration, we apply the model to the problem faced by a developer of a shopping mall who wants to allocate and price its retail space among anchor and non‐anchor stores. We show that a commonly used sequential mechanism is not optimal unless externalities are large enough.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.