Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/approaches-to-representing-social-hierarchy-level-and-social-YbeMCX71Vf
References (31)
-
Brian Lickel, D. Hamilton, G. Wieczorkowska, A. Lewis, S. Sherman, A. Uhles (2000)
Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.Journal of personality and social psychology, 78 2
-
D. DeSilver (2014)
5 facts about economic inequality -
Matthew Weeks, Peter Leavitt (2017)
Using Occupational Titles to Convey an Individual's Location in Social Stratification DimensionsBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 39
-
D. L. Hamilton, S. J. Sherman, S. A. Crump, J. Spencer‐Rodgers (2009)
Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination -
Michael Kraus, Paul Piff, D. Keltner (2011)
Social Class as CultureCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 20
-
Elizabeth Armstrong, Laura Hamilton, E. Armstrong, J. Seeley (2014)
“Good Girls”Social Psychology Quarterly, 77
-
Julie Spencer-Rodgers, D. Hamilton, S. Sherman (2007)
The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups.Journal of personality and social psychology, 92 3
-
(2007)
Report of the APA task force on socioeconomic status -
Michael Kraus, J. Tan, Melanie Tannenbaum (2013)
The Social Ladder: A Rank-Based Perspective on Social ClassPsychological Inquiry, 24
-
E. A. Armstrong, L. T. Hamilton, E. M. Armstrong, J. L. Seeley (2014)
‘Good girls’: Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus, 77
-
Michael Kraus, Nicole Stephens (2012)
A Road Map for an Emerging Psychology of Social ClassSocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 6
-
Samantha Moore-Berg, Andrew Karpinski (2018)
An intersectional approach to understanding how race and social class affect intergroup processesSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
-
Jinkyung Na, Ian McDonough, Micaela Chan, Denise Park (2016)
Social-Class Differences in Consumer ChoicesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42
-
N. Adler, E. Epel, Grace Castellazzo, J. Ickovics (2000)
Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 19 6
-
M. Diemer, Rashmita Mistry, M. Wadsworth, Irene López, Faye Reimers (2013)
Best Practices in Conceptualizing and Measuring Social Class in Psychological ResearchAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13
-
S. Fiske (2010)
Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination -
S. T. Fiske (2010)
Handbook of social psychology -
N. Krieger, David Williams, N. Moss (1997)
Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines.Annual review of public health, 18
-
Joan Ostrove, E. Cole (2003)
Privileging Class: Toward a Critical Psychology of Social Class in the Context of EducationJournal of Social Issues, 59
-
Suzanne Horwitz, J. Dovidio (2017)
The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthyGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20
-
Katy Day, B. Rickett, Maxine Woolhouse (2014)
Class Dismissed: Putting Social Class on the Critical Psychological AgendaSocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 8
-
D. Dubois, Derek Rucker, A. Galinsky (2015)
Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.Journal of personality and social psychology, 108 3
-
S. Blader, Ya-Ru Chen (2012)
Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective.Journal of personality and social psychology, 102 5
-
Michael Kraus, Paul Piff, Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton, Michelle Rheinschmidt, D. Keltner, W. Kraus (2012)
Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor Empirical Traditions in the Study of Social Class -
B. Lott, Susan Saxon (2002)
The Influence of Ethnicity, Social Class, and Context on Judgments About U.S. WomenThe Journal of Social Psychology, 142
-
Sara Crump, D. Hamilton, S. Sherman, Brian Lickel, Vinita Thakkar (2010)
Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groupsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 40
-
A. Manstead (2018)
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviourThe British Journal of Social Psychology, 57
-
Joe Magee, A. Galinsky (2008)
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and StatusThe Academy of Management Annals, 2
-
F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, A. Buchner (2007)
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 39
-
Jinkyung Na, Micaela Chan (2016)
Subjective perception of lower social-class enhances response inhibitionPersonality and Individual Differences, 90
-
L. Litman, Jonathan Robinson, Tzvi Abberbock (2016)
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 49
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2020 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
- ISSN
- 1529-7489
- eISSN
- 1530-2415
- DOI
- 10.1111/asap.12202
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Recent social psychological investigations on the social hierarchy have largely occurred without clear delineations in the language used to reference the different strata in the hierarchy (e.g., upper‐class vs. rich vs. high socioeconomic status [SES]). Both within and between research reports, labels can be used inconsistently. We report four studies comparing social hierarchy category labels (SHCLs) on empirically relevant dimensions. Study 1 examined the subjective SES associated with different SHCLs and found that, despite considerable similarity in terms at both the lower and upper ends of the hierarchy, substantive differences occurred. Study 2 examined perceptions of group entitativity and found that pairs of SHCLs (e.g., Rich/Poor vs. Upper‐/Lower‐Class) differ in judgment‐relevant properties. Study 3 compared four types of SHCLs on dimensions of power, status, and resources. Finally, Study 4 provided an experimental demonstration of the impact of interchanging SHCLs. Implications of the findings and recommendations for ongoing empirical efforts are discussed.
Journal
Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2020