Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Using the percentage of outside directors as a proxy for board monitoring, we find empirical evidence that board monitoring and CEO pay–performance sensitivity (PPS) are substitutes. In 2002, major US exchanges began to require that the boards of listed firms have more than 50% outside directors. In the case of firms affected by this requirement, their CEO PPS decreased significantly because of a reduction of CEO ownership relative to the control group, especially in the case of firms in which outside directors are better informed. We find that this substitution in governance mechanisms did not change overall firm value.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2017
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.