Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Gwet (2014)
Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters
C. Camargo, K. Boggs, R. Cash, Vishal Doshi, Henry Isaacson, K. Hasegawa, A. Raja (2022)
Changes in scientific characteristics of abstracts accepted to the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, 1990–2020Academic Emergency Medicine, 29
KL Gwet (2010)
The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement among Raters
J. Kelly (1998)
Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86 1
Kimberly Gregory (1977)
Meetings and EventsJournal of Dental Research, 56
(2010)
SAEM Abstract scoring rubric . Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
T. Kuczmarski, A. Raja, D. Pallin (2015)
How do Medical Societies Select Science for Conference Presentation? How Should They?Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16
(2023)
scoring rubric
The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) holds an annual meeting at which emergency medicine research is presented.1 Previously, we reviewed a random sample of scientific abstracts accepted for presentation at SAEM from 1990 to 2020.2 Applying SAEM's 2020 scoring criteria, the most recent criteria available at the time of that review, we showed that abstract quality improved over the 30 years.In late 2020, SAEM introduced modified scoring criteria for abstracts accepted to its 2021 annual meeting, and these new criteria are still in use as of early 2023.3 It is unclear if, in practice, the new criteria would yield scores significantly different from those assigned using the 2020 criteria. Therefore, building on our earlier work, we rescored a sample of the previously reviewed abstracts, using the new 2021 criteria. The objective was to compare differences in quality scores using the 2020 and 2021 criteria.This study was reviewed by the Mass General Brigham Human Research Committee and classified as non–human subjects research. For this retrospective study, we compiled all abstracts accepted for presentation at the SAEM annual meeting in 2015 and 2020. We then randomly selected 100 abstracts (50 abstracts from each of the 2 years) for review using the random‐number
Academic Emergency Medicine – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.