Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ausubel (2004)
1452American Economic Review, 94
J.‐J. Laffont, H. Ossard, Q Vuong (1995)
Econometrics of First?Price Auctions, 63
Anton (1987)
57The RAND Journal of Economics, 18
Glenn Ellison (1994)
Theories of Cartel Stability and The Joint Executive Committee, 25
H. Hopenhayn, A Skrzypacz (2004)
Tacit Collusion in Repeated Auctions, 114
James W. Roberts (2013)
Unobserved heterogeneity and reserve prices in auctions, 44
Dan Bernhardt, David Scoones (1994)
A note on Sequential Auctions, 84
James J. Anton, Dennis A. Yao (1987)
Second Sourcing and the Experience Curve: Price Competition in Defense Procurement, 18
Q. Liu (2011)
Equilibrium of a Sequence of Auctions When Bidders Demand Multiple Items, 112
O. Ashenfelter, D Genesove (1992)
Testing for Price Anomalies in Real?Estate Auctions, 82
Ashenfelter (1992)
501American Economic Review, 82
J.H. Kagel (1995)
Handbook of Experimental Economics
R.H. Porter (1983)
A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880?1886, 14
K. Hendricks, R.H. Porter, T Guofu (2008)
Bidding Rings and the Winner's Curse: The Case of Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Auctions, 4
O Valiente (2001)
Sequ�a: Definiciones, Tipolog�as y M�todos de Cuantificaci�n, 26
L.H. Baldwin, R.C. Marshall, J.‐F Richard (1997)
Bidder Collusion at Forest Service Timber Sales, 105
J Levin (1997)
An Optimal Auction for Complements, 18
J.H. Kagel, D Levin (2001)
Behavior in Multi?Unit Demand Auctions: Experiments with Uniform Price and Dynamic Vickrey Auctions, 69
M Stegeman (1996)
Participation Costs and Efficient Auctions, 71
P.A. Haile, E Tamer (2003)
Inference with an Incomplete Model of English Auctions, 111
R. Marshall, M. Raiff, J.‐F. Richard, S Schulenberg (2006)
The Impact of Delivery Synergies on Bidding in the Georgia School Milk Market, 6
M Pesendorfer (2000)
A Study of Collusion in First Price Auctions, 67
J. Black, D De Meza (1992)
Systematic Price Differences between Successive Auctions Are No Anomaly, 1
Armstrong (2000)
455The Review of Economic Studies, 67
P Haile (2001)
Auctions with Resale Markets: An Application to U.S. Forest Service Timber Sales, 91
J.E. Harrington (2008)
Handbook of Antitrust Economics
C Zulehner (2009)
Bidding Behavior in Sequential Cattle Auctions, 27
V. Marmer, A. Shneyerov, P Xu (2013)
What Model for Entry in First?Price Auctions? A Nonparametric Approach, 176
J. Kastl (2011)
Discrete Bids and Empirical Inference in Divisible Good Auctions, 78
T. Palfrey (1983)
Bundling Decisions By a Multiproduct Monopolist with Incomplete Information
R Cassady (1967)
Auctions and Auctioneering
Ashenfelter (1989)
23Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3
R.H. Porter, J.D Zona (1999)
Ohio School Milk Markets: An Analysis of Bidding, 30
T. Li, X Zheng (2009)
Entry and Competition Effects in First?Price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Procurement Auctions, 76
T. Jeitschko, E Wolfstetter (2002)
Scale Economies and the Dynamics of Recurring Auctions, 40
K. Hendricks, R.H Porter (1988)
An Empirical Study of an Auction with Asymmetric Information, 78
Athey (2002)
2107Econometrica, 70
O Ashenfelter (1989)
How Auctions Work for Wine and Art, 3
Mar Reguant (2014)
Complementary Bidding Mechanisms and Startup Costs in Electricity Markets, 81
S. Athey, J. Levin, E Seira (2011)
Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Timber Auctions, 126
C. Wolfram (1998)
Strategic Bidding in aMulti?Unit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales, 29
E Krasnokutskaya (2011)
Identification and Estimation in Highway Procurement Auctions under Unobserved Auction Heterogeneity, 78
A Hortaçsu (2011)
Recent Progress in the Empirical Analysis of Multi?Unit Auctions, 29
J Asker (2010)
A Study of the Internal Organization of a Bidding Cartel, 100
K Coman (1911)
Some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation, 1
Fernando Branco (1997)
Sequential Auctions with Synergies: An Example, 54
Athey (2011)
207Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126
J.H. Kagel, D. Levin (2005)
Multi?Unit Demand Auctions with Synergies: Behavior in Sealed?Bid versus Ascending?Bid Uniform?Price Auctions, 53
J.R Groeger (2014)
A Study of Participation in Dynamic Auctions, 55
N.‐H Fehr (1994)
Predatory Bidding in Sequential Auctions, 46
R. Weber (1983)
Auctions, Bidding and Contracting
R.P. Mcafee, J. Mcmillan (1987)
Auctions with Entry, 23
B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, M Schwarz (2007)
Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Keywords, 97
Mark Armstrong (2000)
Optimal Multi?Object Auctions, 67
S. Athey, P.A Haile (2002)
Identification of Standard Auction Models, 70
M Gentzkow (2007)
Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarity: Online Newspapers, 3
R.H Porter (2005)
Detecting Collusion, 26
N.M. Kiefer (1980)
A Note on Switching Regressions and Logistic Discrimination, 48
P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, R Steinberg (2006)
Combinatorial Auctions
Neil Gandal (1997)
Sequential Auctions of Interdependent Objects: Israeli Cable Television Licenses, 45
R Engelbrecht‐Wiggans (1993)
Optimal Auctions Revisited, 5
R.P. McAfee, J McMillan (1992)
Bidding Rings, 82
R Engelbrecht‐Wiggans (1994)
Sequential Auctions of Stochastically Equivalent Objects, 44
E Ostrom (1992)
Crafting Institutions for Self?Governing Irrigation Systems
R.P. McAfee, D Vincent (1993)
The Declining Price Anomaly, 60
Asker (2010)
724American Economic Review, 100
T. Li, X Zheng (2012)
Information Acquisition and/or Bid Preparation: A Structural Analysis of Entry and Bidding in Timber Sale Auctions, 168
L.M Ausubel (2004)
An Efficient Ascending?Bid Auction for Multiple Objects, 94
Paul Milgrom (2000)
Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction, 108
Mireia Jofre‐Bonet, Martin Pesendorfer (2003)
Estimation of a dynamic auction game, 71
D. Graham, R Marshall (1987)
Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single?Object Second?Price and English Auctions, 95
P. Milgrom, R Weber (1982)
A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, 50
We use data on sequential water auctions to estimate demand when units are complements or substitutes. A sequential English auction model determines the estimating structural equations. When units are complements, one bidder wins all units by paying a high price for the first unit, thus deterring others from bidding on subsequent units. When units are substitutes, different bidders win the units with positive probability, paying prices similar in magnitude. We recover individual demand consistent with this stark pattern of outcomes and confirm it is not collusive but consistent with noncooperative behavior. Demand estimates are biased if one ignores these features.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.