Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/data-driven-safe-gain-scheduling-control-ecWhsM2eqr
References (51)
-
M. Romdlony, B. Jayawardhana (2016)
Stabilization with guaranteed safety using Control Lyapunov-Barrier FunctionAutom., 66
-
Alessandro Luppi, C. Persis, P. Tesi (2022)
On data-driven stabilization of systems with nonlinearities satisfying quadratic constraintsSyst. Control. Lett., 163
-
Mohammed Alshiekh, R. Bloem, Rüdiger Ehlers, Bettina Könighofer, S. Niekum, U. Topcu (2017)
Safe Reinforcement Learning via ShieldingArXiv, abs/1708.08611
-
Yue Wang, Abdullah Newaz, J. Hernández, Swarat Chaudhuri, L. Kavraki (2018)
Online Partial Conditional Plan Synthesis for POMDPs With Safe-Reachability Objectives: Methods and ExperimentsIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18
-
Felix Berkenkamp, Angela Schoellig (2015)
Safe and robust learning control with Gaussian processes2015 European Control Conference (ECC)
-
A. Ames, J. Grizzle, P. Tabuada (2014)
Control barrier function based quadratic programs with application to adaptive cruise control53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
-
B. Lopez, J. Slotine, J. How (2021)
Robust Adaptive Control Barrier Functions: An Adaptive and Data-Driven Approach to SafetyIEEE Control Systems Letters, 5
-
Z. Marvi, Bahare Kiumarsi-Khomartash (2022)
Barrier-Certified Learning-Enabled Safe Control Design for Systems Operating in Uncertain EnvironmentsIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9
-
Wei Xiao, C. Belta, C. Cassandras (2019)
Decentralized merging control in traffic networks: a control barrier function approachProceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
-
Weiming Xiang, Hoang-Dung Tran, Joel Rosenfeld, Taylor Johnson (2018)
Reachable Set Estimation and Safety Verification for Piecewise Linear Systems with Neural Network Controllers2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC)
-
A. Ames, Xiangru Xu, J. Grizzle, P. Tabuada (2016)
Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical SystemsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62
-
Majid Mazouchi, S. Nageshrao, H. Modares (2022)
Conflict-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Meta-Cognitive Learning FrameworkIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9
-
Weiming Xiang, Hoang-Dung Tran, Taylor Johnson (2017)
Reachable Set Computation and Safety Verification for Neural Networks with ReLU ActivationsArXiv, abs/1712.08163
-
A. Bisoffi, C. Persis, P. Tesi (2020)
Controller Design for Robust Invariance From Noisy DataIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68
-
H. Modares (2022)
Data-driven Safe Control of Linear Systems Under Epistemic and Aleatory UncertaintiesArXiv, abs/2202.04495
-
Sebastian Junges, N. Jansen, C. Dehnert, U. Topcu, J. Katoen (2015)
Safety-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for MDPs -
Rui Wang, Min Liu, Yanhua Ma (2019)
Fault estimation for aero‐engine LPV systems based on LFTAsian Journal of Control, 23
-
Rui Wang, Cheng Liu, Yan Shi (2021)
Optimal control of aero‐engine systems based on a switched LPV modelAsian Journal of Control, 23
-
Anayo Akametalu, Shahab Kaynama, J. Fisac, M. Zeilinger, J. Gillula, C. Tomlin (2014)
Reachability-based safe learning with Gaussian processes53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
-
S. Prajna, A. Rantzer (2005)
Primal-Dual Tests for Safety and Reachability -
M. Romdlony, B. Jayawardhana (2014)
Uniting Control Lyapunov and Control Barrier Functions53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
-
A. Marcos, G. Balas (2004)
Development of linear-parameter-varying models for aircraftJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 27
-
S. Prajna, A. Jadbabaie (2004)
International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control -
Nathan Hunt, Nathan Fulton, Sara Magliacane, Nghia Hoang, Subhro Das, Armando Solar-Lezama (2020)
Verifiably safe exploration for end-to-end reinforcement learningProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
-
K. Tee, S. Ge, F. Tay (2009)
Barrier Lyapunov Functions for the control of output-constrained nonlinear systemsAutom., 45
-
Li Wang, Dongkun Han, M. Egerstedt (2018)
Permissive Barrier Certificates for Safe Stabilization Using Sum-of-squares2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC)
-
J. Hanema, R. Tóth, M. Lazar (2017)
Stabilizing non-linear MPC using linear parameter-varying representations2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
-
Matheus Reis, Antonio Aguiar, P. Tabuada (2020)
Control Barrier Function-Based Quadratic Programs Introduce Undesirable Asymptotically Stable EquilibriaIEEE Control Systems Letters, 5
-
Richard Cheng, G. Orosz, R. Murray, J. Burdick (2019)
End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Tasks -
Pablo Cisneros, Sophia Voss, H. Werner (2016)
Efficient Nonlinear Model Predictive Control via quasi-LPV representation2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
-
Shuo Li, O. Bastani (2019)
Robust Model Predictive Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Dynamics2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
-
S. Prajna, A. Jadbabaie (2004)
Safety Verification of Hybrid Systems Using Barrier Certificates -
N. Sadati, A. Hooshmand (2006)
Design of a Gain-Scheduling Anti-Swing Controller for Tower Cranes Using Fuzzy Clustering Techniques2006 International Conference on Computational Inteligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and International Commerce (CIMCA'06)
-
Andrew Taylor, A. Ames (2019)
Adaptive Safety with Control Barrier Functions2020 American Control Conference (ACC)
-
R. Pereira, K. Kienitz, M. Oliveira (2020)
Coprime factorization of polytopic LPV systems based on a homogeneous polynomial approachAsian Journal of Control, 23
-
S. Hashemi, H. Abbas, H. Werner (2012)
Low-complexity linear parameter-varying modeling and control of a robotic manipulatorControl Engineering Practice, 20
-
L. Cavanini, G. Ippoliti, E. Camacho (2021)
Model Predictive Control for a Linear Parameter Varying Model of an UAVJournal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 101
-
H. Waarde (2021)
Beyond Persistent Excitation: Online Experiment Design for Data-Driven Modeling and ControlIEEE Control. Syst. Lett., 6
-
A. Bisoffi, C. Persis, P. Tesi (2019)
Data-based guarantees of set invariance propertiesArXiv, abs/1911.12293
-
Quan Nguyen, K. Sreenath (2016)
Exponential Control Barrier Functions for enforcing high relative-degree safety-critical constraints2016 American Control Conference (ACC)
-
H. Waarde, J. Eising, H. Trentelman, M. Camlibel (2019)
Data Informativity: A New Perspective on Data-Driven Analysis and ControlIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65
-
F. Blanchini, S. Miani (2007)
Set-theoretic methods in control -
Weiming Xiang, Taylor Johnson (2018)
Reachability Analysis and Safety Verification for Neural Network Control SystemsArXiv, abs/1805.09944
-
J. Willems, P. Rapisarda, I. Markovsky, B. Moor (2005)
A note on persistency of excitation2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601), 3
-
Xu Jiangpeng, Yang Lingyu, Z. Jing (2020)
LPV Model-Based Parameter Estimation For Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC)
-
Shashank Pathak, Luca Pulina, A. Tacchella (2017)
Verification and repair of control policies for safe reinforcement learningApplied Intelligence, 48
-
N. Jansen, Bettina Könighofer, Sebastian Junges, A. Serban, R. Bloem (2020)
Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Probabilistic Shields -
M. Zanon, S. Gros (2021)
Safe reinforcement learning using robust MPC, 66
-
J. Hanema, R. Tóth, M. Lazar (2021)
Stabilizing non‐linear model predictive control using linear parameter‐varying embeddings and tubesIET Control Theory & Applications
-
M. Ahmadi, Arie Israel, U. Topcu (2020)
Safe Controller Synthesis for Data-Driven Differential InclusionsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65
-
A. Aswani, Humberto González, S. Sastry, C. Tomlin (2011)
Provably safe and robust learning-based model predictive controlArXiv, abs/1107.2487
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2023 Chinese Automatic Control Society and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
- ISSN
- 1561-8625
- eISSN
- 1934-6093
- DOI
- 10.1002/asjc.3169
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Data‐based safe gain‐scheduling controllers are presented for discrete‐time linear parameter‐varying systems (LPV) with polytopic models. First, λ$$ \lambda $$‐contractivity conditions are provided under which the safety and stability of the LPV systems are unified through Minkowski functions of the safe sets. Then, a data‐based representation of the closed‐loop LPV system is provided, which requires less restrictive data richness conditions than identifying the system dynamics. This sample‐efficient closed‐loop data‐based representation is leveraged to design data‐driven gain‐scheduling controllers that guarantee λ$$ \lambda $$‐contractivity and, thus, invariance of the safe sets. It is also shown that the problem of designing a data‐driven gain‐scheduling controller for a polyhedral (ellipsoidal) safe set amounts to a linear program (a semi‐definite program). The motivation behind direct learning of a safe controller is that identifying an LPV system requires satisfying the persistence of the excitation (PE) condition. It is shown in this paper, however, that directly learning a safe controller and bypassing the system identification can be achieved without satisfying the PE condition. This data‐richness reduction is of vital importance, especially for LPV systems that are open‐loop unstable, and collecting rich samples to satisfy the PE condition can jeopardize their safety. A simulation example is provided to show the effectiveness of the presented approach.
Journal
Asian Journal of Control – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2023
Keywords: data‐driven control; gain‐scheduling control; invariant sets; safe control; set‐theoretic methods