Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/demystifying-the-gold-standard-of-arms-export-controls-us-arms-exports-5khF7Zxuww
References (16)
-
N.J. Lucas, M.J. Vassalotti (2020)
Transfer of defense articles: Sale and export of US?made arms to foreign entities -
(2020)
Power, profit, or prudence? US arms sales since 9/11 -
R. Stohl (2010)
US policy and the arms trade treaty -
A.T. Thrall, C. Dorminey (2018)
Risky business: the role of arms sales in U.S. foreign policy -
S. Perlo‐Freeman (2021)
Business as usual: how major weapons exporters arm the World's conflicts -
J.L. Erickson (2015a)
Dangerous trade: arms exports, human rights, and international reputation -
(1997)
Treaties as binding international obligation -
J. Brown (2019)
Fourth MPOME regional workshop -
P.K. Kerr (2021)
Arms sales congressional review process -
J.E. Nolan (1997)
Cascade of arms -
Jennifer Erickson (2015)
Saint or Sinner? Human Rights and U.S. Support for the Arms Trade TreatyPolitical Science Quarterly, 130
-
W. Hartung (1995)
US conventional arms transfers: Promoting stability or fueling conflict?Arms Control Today, 25
-
M.G. Dalton, H. Shah, S.N. Green, R. Hughes (2018)
Oversight and accountability in US security sector assistance: seeking return on investment -
A. Tolany, A. Bertschi Wrigley, A. Shiel, E. Yousif, L. Woods (2021)
Demystifying end?use monitoring in US arms exports -
M.T. Klare (1992)
Conventional arms transfers: exporting security or arming adversaries? -
(2011)
Persian gulf: implementation gaps limit the effectiveness of end?use monitoring and human rights vetting for US military equipment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2023 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- ISSN
- 1758-5880
- eISSN
- 1758-5899
- DOI
- 10.1111/1758-5899.13181
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This article examines why US‐made and US‐supplied weapons consistently appear in conflicts around the world, despite the United States having what is commonly lauded as the ‘gold standard’ of national arms export control systems. On paper, US law and policy discourage arms transfers to areas engaged in or at risk of conflict. US arms export controls also informed the creation of the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which provides legally binding conventional arms export criteria. Yet in the recent Yemen, Syria and Libya conflicts, among many others, the United States has directly supplied or indirectly facilitated the supply of weapons to conflict parties. This article highlights two factors that help to account for this apparent policy failure: the flexible design of US law and policy and the inherent challenges of ensuring that weapons in conflict zones—especially small arms—go to and stay with their intended recipients. These findings have important implications for US foreign policy, ATT implementation and the human costs of conflict around the world.
Journal
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2023