Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies

Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies The extent to which judicial outcomes depend on judges' identities is a central question in multiethnic societies. Past work on the impact of the racial composition of appellate courts has narrowly focused on civil rights cases in the United States. We expand this literature by testing for ethnicity‐based panel effects in criminal appeals in Israel. Using randomness in the assignment of cases to panels, we find that appeal outcomes for Jewish defendants are independent of panels' ethnic composition. By contrast, panel composition is highly consequential for Arab defendants, who receive more lenient punishments when their case is heard by a panel that includes at least one Arab judge, compared to all‐Jewish panels. The magnitude of these effects is sizable: a 14–20% reduction in incarceration and a 15–26% reduction in prison sentencing. These findings contribute to recent debates on the relationship between descriptive representation and substantive outcomes in judicial bodies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Political Science Wiley

Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies

Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/descriptive-representation-and-judicial-outcomes-in-multiethnic-sX0DsXwtkm
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
©2016 by the Midwest Political Science Association
ISSN
0092-5853
eISSN
1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/ajps.12187
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The extent to which judicial outcomes depend on judges' identities is a central question in multiethnic societies. Past work on the impact of the racial composition of appellate courts has narrowly focused on civil rights cases in the United States. We expand this literature by testing for ethnicity‐based panel effects in criminal appeals in Israel. Using randomness in the assignment of cases to panels, we find that appeal outcomes for Jewish defendants are independent of panels' ethnic composition. By contrast, panel composition is highly consequential for Arab defendants, who receive more lenient punishments when their case is heard by a panel that includes at least one Arab judge, compared to all‐Jewish panels. The magnitude of these effects is sizable: a 14–20% reduction in incarceration and a 15–26% reduction in prison sentencing. These findings contribute to recent debates on the relationship between descriptive representation and substantive outcomes in judicial bodies.

Journal

American Journal of Political Science – Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 2016

References

  • Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?
    Abrams, Abrams; Bertrand, Bertrand; Mullainathan, Mullainathan
  • Role Orientations and Women State Supreme Court Justices
    Allen, Allen; Wall, Wall
  • The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials
    Anwar, Anwar; Bayer, Bayer; Hjalmarsson, Hjalmarsson
  • Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes
    Ashenfelter, Ashenfelter; Eisenberg, Eisenberg; Schwab, Schwab
  • A Market Test for Race Discrimination in Bail Setting
    Ayres, Ayres; Waldfogel, Waldfogel
  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
    Boyd, Boyd; Epstein, Epstein; Martin, Martin
  • Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India
    Chattopadhyay, Chattopadhyay; Duflo, Duflo
  • Unwrapping Racial Harassment Law
    Chew, Chew; Kelley, Kelley
  • Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Disparity in Adult Felony Courts in Israel
    Cohen, Cohen; Fishman, Fishman; Soroka, Soroka
  • The Impact of Ethnicity on Probation Recommendations and Dispositions in Israel
    Cohen, Cohen; Palmor, Palmor
  • Judging the Voting Rights Act
    Cox, Cox; Miles, Miles
  • Group Decision Making on Appellate Panels: Presiding Justice and Opinion Justice Influence in the Israel Supreme Court
    Eisenberg, Eisenberg; Fisher, Fisher; Rosen‐Zvi, Rosen‐Zvi
  • Reconsidering Judicial Preferences
    Epstein, Epstein; Knight, Knight
  • Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation under Panel decision making
    Farhang, Farhang; Wawro, Wawro
  • Interpreting Circuit Court Voting Patterns: A Social Interactions Framework
    Fischman, Fischman
  • Sentencing Outcomes in a Multinational Society: When Judges, Defendants and Victims Can Be Either Arabs or Jews
    Fishman, Fishman; Rattner, Rattner; Turjeman, Turjeman
  • Let My People Go: Ethnic ingroup Bias in Judicial Decisions—Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment
    Gazal‐Ayal, Gazal‐Ayal; Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, Sulitzeanu‐Kenan
  • Women as Policy Makers: The Case of Trial Judges
    Gruhl, Gruhl; Spohn, Spohn; Welch, Welch
  • Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases
    Gryski, Gryski; Main, Main; Dixon, Dixon
  • The Lower Court and Minorities in Israel
    Haj, Haj; Rahav, Rahav; Teichman, Teichman
  • The Offence of Breaking and Entering—Variables Affecting Consistency in Sentencing
    Hassin, Hassin; Kremnitzer, Kremnitzer
  • Estimation of Causal Effects Using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization
    Hirano, Hirano; Imbens, Imbens
  • Judges' Ethnicity and Minority Sentencing: Evidence Concerning Hispanics
    Holmes, Holmes; Hosch, Hosch; Daudistel, Daudistel; Perez, Perez; Graves, Graves
  • Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data
    Honaker, Honaker; King, King; Blackwell, Blackwell
  • Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence
    Ifill, Ifill
  • Multilevel Context of Criminal Sentencing: Integrating Judge‐ and County‐Level Influences
    Johnson, Johnson
  • Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts
    Kastellec, Kastellec
  • Rates of Incarceration and Main Trends in Israeli Prisons
    Korn, Korn
  • Economic Analysis of Social Interactions
    Manski, Manski
  • Men and Women on the Bench: Vive la Difference?
    Martin, Martin
  • The Untroubled World of Jurimetrics
    Mendelson, Mendelson
  • Testing Relations between Judicial Characteristics and Judicial decision making
    Nagel, Nagel
  • Strike Three: Discrimination, Incentives, and Evaluation
    Parsons, Parsons; Sulaeman, Sulaeman; Yates, Yates; Hamermesh, Hamermesh
  • Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts
    Peresie, Peresie
  • Racial Discrimination among NBA Referees
    Price, Price; Wolfers, Wolfers
  • Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?
    Rachlinski, Rachlinski; Johnson, Johnson; Wistrich, Wistrich
  • Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District‐Level Judicial Demographics
    Schanzenbach, Schanzenbach
  • Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism
    Shayo, Shayo; Zussman, Zussman
  • Does Racial Redistricting Cause Conservative Policy Outcomes? Policy Preferences of Southern Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s
    Shotts, Shotts
  • On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations
    Sommers, Sommers
  • The Sentencing Decisions of Black and White Judges: Expected and Unexpected Similarities
    Spohn, Spohn
  • Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently?
    Steffensmeier, Steffensmeier; Britt, Britt
  • Black Elite Decision Making: The Case of Trial Judges
    Uhlman, Uhlman
  • Attitudinal and Neo‐Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel
    Weinshall‐Margel, Weinshall‐Margel
  • Do Black Judges Make a Difference?
    Welch, Welch; Combs, Combs; Gruhl, Gruhl
  • twang: Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups
    Ridgeway, Greg; McCaffrey, Dan; Morral, Andrew; Griffin, Beth Ann; Burgette, Lane
  • Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District‐Level Judicial Demographics
    Schanzenbach, Max
  • Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism
    Shayo, Moses; Zussman, Asaf
  • Does Racial Redistricting Cause Conservative Policy Outcomes? Policy Preferences of Southern Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s
    Shotts, Kenneth W
  • On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations
    Sommers, Samuel
  • The Sentencing Decisions of Black and White Judges: Expected and Unexpected Similarities
    Spohn, Cassia
  • How Do Judges Decide? The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment
    Spohn, Cassia
  • Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently?
    Steffensmeier, Darrell; Britt, Chester L.
  • The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations
    Tajfel, Henry; Turner, John
  • Black Elite Decision Making: The Case of Trial Judges
    Uhlman, Thomas M
  • Attitudinal and Neo‐Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel
    Weinshall‐Margel, Keren
  • Do Black Judges Make a Difference?
    Welch, Susan; Combs, Michael; Gruhl, John