Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rust Rust (1993)
Gauss and Matlab: A ComparisonJournal of Applied Econometrics, 8
Anderson (2001)
Product Diversity in Asymmetric Oligopoly: Is the Quality of Consumer Goods Too LowJournal of Industrial Organization
Baake Baake, Boom Boom (2001)
Vertical Product Differentiation, Network Externalities, and Compatibility DecisionsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 19
Holmström Holmström, Myerson Myerson (1983)
Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete InformationEconometrica, 51
Farrell Farrell, Katz Katz (1998)
The Effects of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Law on Compatibility and InnovationAntitrust Bulletin, 43
Ui Ui (2006)
Correlated Quantal Responses and Equilibrium SelectionGames and Economic Behavior, 57
Judd Judd (1985)
The Law of Large Numbers with a Continuum of IID Random VariablesJournal of Economic Theory
Carlsson Carlsson, Van Damme Van Damme (1993)
Global Games and Equilibrium SelectionEconometrica, 61
Farrell Farrell, Saloner Saloner (1986)
Standardization and VarietyEconomics Letters, 20
De Palma De Palma, Leruth Leruth (1993)
Equilibrium in Competing Networks with Differentiated ProductsTransportation Science, 27
Mitchell Mitchell, Skrzypacz Skrzypacz (2006)
Network Externalities and Long?Run Market SharesEconomic Theory, 29
Shaked Shaked, Sutton Sutton (1982)
Relaxing Price Competition through Product DifferentiationReview of Economic Studies, 49
Chou Chou, Shy Shy (1990)
Network Effects without Network ExternalitiesInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 8
Church Church, Gandal Gandal (1992)
Network Effects without Network ExternalitiesJournal of Industrial Organization, 40
We consider a model of price competition in a duopoly with product differentiation and network effects. In the efficient allocation, both networks are active and the firm with the highest expected quality has the largest market share. To characterize the equilibrium allocation, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the equilibrium of the coordination game played by consumers for given prices. The equilibrium allocation differs from the efficient one for two reasons. First, the equilibrium allocation of consumers to the networks is too balanced, because consumers fail to internalize network externalities. Second, if access to the networks is priced by strategic firms, then the product with the highest expected quality is also the most expensive. This further reduces the asymmetry between market shares and therefore social welfare.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.