Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany,... The purpose of the study was to investigate how drivers use assisted and automated driving systems (DAS), more specifically their usage of SAE Level 1 and Level 2 systems, in different situations. An online survey was distributed to 2500 respondents in China, Germany, Spain, and the USA. The final dataset consisted of 549 respondents, all non‐professional drivers, with access to a minimum of a Level 1 system. A subset, 159 in total, had access also to a Level 2 DAS. The survey included questions on the attitude towards, access to, and usage of Level 1 and Level 2 systems in nine different situations respectively. The data was analysed on an individual and a national level. A cluster analysis showed two main groups: frequent and non‐frequent users. On an individual level, the reported usage of Level 1 and Level 2 DAS respectively differed depending on traffic situation, weather and daylight conditions and driver state. Reports by respondents with access to both Level 1 and Level 2 systems did not reveal any statistically significant differences in usage between situations. The Spanish sample was the only one that showed a consistently different usage pattern compared to samples from China, Germany, and the USA. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png IET Intelligent Transport Systems Wiley

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/drivers-usage-of-driving-automation-systems-in-different-contexts-a-CrK8s3jLf0
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
eISSN
1751-9578
DOI
10.1049/itr2.12392
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate how drivers use assisted and automated driving systems (DAS), more specifically their usage of SAE Level 1 and Level 2 systems, in different situations. An online survey was distributed to 2500 respondents in China, Germany, Spain, and the USA. The final dataset consisted of 549 respondents, all non‐professional drivers, with access to a minimum of a Level 1 system. A subset, 159 in total, had access also to a Level 2 DAS. The survey included questions on the attitude towards, access to, and usage of Level 1 and Level 2 systems in nine different situations respectively. The data was analysed on an individual and a national level. A cluster analysis showed two main groups: frequent and non‐frequent users. On an individual level, the reported usage of Level 1 and Level 2 DAS respectively differed depending on traffic situation, weather and daylight conditions and driver state. Reports by respondents with access to both Level 1 and Level 2 systems did not reveal any statistically significant differences in usage between situations. The Spanish sample was the only one that showed a consistently different usage pattern compared to samples from China, Germany, and the USA.

Journal

IET Intelligent Transport Systems – Wiley

Published: Jun 6, 2023

Keywords: advanced driver assistance system; automated driving automation systems; automated driving support system; driving automation; traffic situation; usage

References

  • Decision‐making on when to brake and when to steer to avoid a collision
    Brännström, M.; Coelingh, E.; Sjöberg, J.
  • Adaptive fuzzy control for inter‐vehicle gap keeping
    Naranjo, J. E.; Gonzalez, C.; Reviejo, J.; Garcia, R.; Pedro, T.
  • Ergonomics issues with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)
    Young, M.
  • Review of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)
    Ziebinski, A.; Cupek, R.; Grzechca, D.; Chruszczyk, L.
  • Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles
    Becker, F.; Axhausen, K. W.
  • Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability
    Payre, W.; Cestac, J.; Delhomme, P.
  • Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles
    Liljamo, T.; Liimatainen, H.; Pöllänen, M.
  • Towards autonomous cars
    Rödel, C.; Stadler, S.; Meschtscherjakov, A.; Tscheligi, M.
  • Drivers' acceptance of advanced driver assistance systems. What to consider?
    Viktorová, L.; Sucha, M.
  • Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control
    Stanton, N.A.; Young, M. S.
  • Adaptive cruise control field operational test the learning phase
    Weinberger, M.
  • Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control
    Larsson, A. F. L.
  • Use of adaptive cruise control functions on motorways and urban roads: Changes over time in an on‐road study
    Pereira, M.; Beggiato, M.; Petzoldt, T.
  • Driving behavior interaction with ACC: results from a field operational test in the Netherlands
    Viti, F.; Hoogendoorn, P.; Alkim, T. P.; Bootsma, G.
  • Naturalistic driving study for automated driver assistance systems (ADAS) evaluation in the Chinese, Swedish and American markets
    Orlovska, J.; Wickman, C.; Söderberg, R.
  • Requirements for the design of advanced driver assistance systems—The differences between Swedish and Chinese drivers
    Lindgren, A. M.; Chen, F.; Jordan, P.W.; Zhang, H.
  • Same, same but different
    Wang, M.; Lyckvi, S.; Chen, F.
  • Design, User Experience, and Usability: Interactive Experience Design
    Gonçalves, R. C.; Quaresma, M.
  • SPSS twostep cluster—A first evaluation. Arbeits‐ und Diskussionspapiere 2004‐2
    Bacher, J.; Wenzig, K.; Vogler, M.
  • A comparison of three clustering methods for finding subgroups in MRI, SMS or clinical data: SPSS twostep cluster analysis, latent gold and SNOB
    Kent, P.; Jensen, R.K.; Kongsted, A.
  • Effects of the driving context on the usage of automated driver assistance systems (ADAS) ‐ naturalistic driving study for ADAS evaluation
    Orlovska, J.; Novakazi, F.; Bligård, L‐O.; Karlsson, M.; Wickman, C.; Söderberg, R.
  • Availability, demand, perceived contraints and disuse of ADAS technologies in Spain: findings from a national study
    Lijarcio, I.; Useche, S.A.; Llamazarez, J.; Montoro, L.
  • Stepping over the threshold linking understanding and usage of automated driver assistance systems (ADAS)
    Novakazi, F.; Orlovska, J.; Bligård, L‐O.; Wickman, C.
  • “Do I really need it?” An explorative study of acceptance and usage of in‐vehicle technology
    Stiegemeier, D.; Bringheland, S.; Kraus, J.; Baumann, M.
  • Driver acceptance of adaptive cruise control and active lane keeping in five production vehicles
    Reagan, I.J.; Kidd, D.G.; Cicchino, J.B.
  • Vehicle Owners' Experiences with and Reaction to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
    McDonald, A.; Carney, C.; McGehee, D.V.
  • The association between national culture, road safety performance and support for safety policy measures
    Van den Berghe, W.; Schachner, M.; Sgarra, M.; Christie, N.
  • To drive or not to drive—When users prefer to use automated driving functions
    Johansson, M.; Novakazi, F.