Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Acquisti, C. Taylor, L. Wagman (2016)
The economics of privacy, 54
E. Bond, L. Samuelson (1987)
The coase conjecture need not hold for durable good monopolies with depreciation, 24
D. Laussel, N. V. Long, J. Resende (2020b)
Quality and price personalization under customer recognition: A dynamic monopoly model, 114
R. B. Esteves (2010)
Pricing with customer recognition, 28
L. Karp (1996)
Depreciation erodes the coase conjecture, 40
D. Laussel, N. V. Long, J. Resende (2015)
Network effects, aftermarkets and the coase conjecture, 41
Q. Liu, K. Serfes (2004)
Quality of information and oligopolistic price discrimination, 13
D. Fudenberg, J. M. Villas‐Boas (2012)
Oxford handbook of the digital economy
N. V. Long (2015)
Dynamic games between firms and infinitely?lived consumers: A review of the literature, 5
T. Gehrig, O. Shy, R. Stenbacka (2011)
History?based price discrimination and entry in markets with switching costs, 55
D. Fudenberg, J. M. Villas‐Boas (2006)
Economics and information systems
L. A. Stole (2007)
Handbook of industrial organization, 3
R. B. Esteves (2009)
Price discrimination with partial information: Does it pay?off?, 105
J. I. Bulow (1982)
Durable goods monopolists, 90
T. J. Holmes (1989)
The effects of third?degree price discrimination in oligopoly, 79
K. S. Corts (1998)
Third?degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All?out competition and strategic commitment, 29
J. F. Thisse, X. Vives (1988)
On the strategic choice of spatial price policy, 78
F. Gul, H. Sonnenschein, R. Wilson (1986)
Foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture, 39
R. C Blattberg, J Deighton (1991)
Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability, 33
T. Gehrig, O. Shy, R. Stenbacka (2012)
A welfare evaluation of history?based price discrimination, 12
R. Coase (1972)
Durability and monopoly, 15
Y. Chen, J. Pearcy (2010)
Dynamic pricing: When to entice brand switching and when to reward consumer loyalty, 41
M. Villas‐Boas (1999)
Dynamic competition with customer recognition, 30
A. Acquisti, H. R. VArian (2005)
Conditioning prices on purchase history, 24
Y. Chen (1999)
Oligopoly price discrimination and resale price maintenance, 30
C. Choe, S. King, N. Matsushima (2018)
Pricing with cookies: Behavior?based price discrimination and spatial price competition, 64
J. Tirole (1988)
The theory of industrial organization
O. Hart, J. Tirole (1988)
Contract renegotiation and coasian dynamics, 55
D. Fudenberg, J. Tirole (2000)
Customer poaching and brand switching, 31
C. Kahn (1987)
The durable goods monopolist and consistency with increasing costs, 54
D. Laussel, N. V. Long, J. Resende (2020a)
The curse of knowledge: Having access to customer information can reduce monopoly profits, 51
N. L. Stokey (1981)
Rational expectations and durable goods pricing, 12
Y. Chen (1997)
Paying customers to switch, 6
Using a Markov‐perfect equilibrium model, we show that the use of customer data to practice intertemporal price discrimination will improve monopoly profit if and only if information precision is higher than a certain threshold level. This U‐shaped relationship lends support to a popular view that knowledge is good only if it is sufficiently refined. When information accuracy can only be achieved through costly investment, we find that investing in profiling is profitable only if this allows to reach a high enough level of information precision. Consumers expected surplus being a hump‐shaped function of information accuracy, we show that consumers have an incentive to lobby for privacy protection legislation which raises the cost of monopoly's investment in information accuracy. However, this cost should not dissuade firms to collect some information on customers' tastes, as the absence of consumers' profiling is actually detrimental to consumers.
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Keywords: big data; consumers' collective action on privacy protection legislation; consumers profiling; dynamic monopoly; endogenous investment in profiling capability
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.