Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Sappington (2005)
Regulating Service Quality: A SurveyJournal of Regulatory Economics, 27
Gérard Gaudet, P. Lassere, N. Long (1995)
Optimal Resource Royalties with Unknown and Temporally Independent Extraction Cost StructuresInternational Economic Review, 36
S. Athey, I. Segal (2013)
An Efficient Dynamic MechanismEconometrica, 81
J. Laffont, J. Tirole (1986)
Using Cost Observation to Regulate FirmsJournal of Political Economy, 94
J. Laffont, J. Tirole (1990)
Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in ProcurementThe Review of Economic Studies, 57
(1996)
Dynamic Incentive Contracts with Uncorrelated Private Information and History Dependent Outcomes
Dennis Gaertner (2004)
Endogenizing Private Information: Incentive Contracts under Learning By Doing
Philippe Gagnepain, M. Ivaldi (2002)
Incentive Regulatory Policies: The Case of Public Transit Systems in FranceThe RAND Journal of Economics, 33
Gianni Fraja, A. Iozzi (2004)
Bigger and Better: A Dynamic Regulatory Mechanism for Optimum QualityIO: Regulation
T. Lewis, D. Sappington (1997)
Penalizing Success in Dynamic Incentive Contracts: No Good Deed Goes Unpunished?The RAND Journal of Economics, 28
D. Baron, R. Myerson (1982)
Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown CostsEconometrica, 50
F. Wolak (1994)
An Econometric Analysis of the Asymmetric Information, Regulator-Utility InteractionAnnals of economics and statistics
Tyrrel Rockafellar, W. Fenchel (1970)
Convex Analysis
M. Battaglini (2005)
Long-Term Contracting with Markovian ConsumersThe American Economic Review, 95
W. Rogerson (1985)
Repeated Moral HazardEconometrica, 53
X. Freixas, R. Guesnerie, J. Tirole (1985)
Planning Under Incomplete Information and the Ratchet Effect.The Review of Economic Studies, 52
I. Vogelsang, J. Finsinger (1979)
A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly FirmsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 10
C. d'Aspremont, L. Gérard-Varet (1979)
Incentives and incomplete informationJournal of Public Economics, 11
Gianni Fraja, A. Iozzi (2008)
The Quest for Quality: A Quality Adjusted Dynamic Regulatory MechanismIO: Regulation
Gaudet Gaudet, Lasserre Lasserre, Long Long (1995)
Optimal Resource Royalties with Unknown and Temporally Independent Cost StructuresInternational Economic Review, 36
Wolak Wolak (1994)
An Econometric Analysis of the Asymmetric Information, Regulator‐Utility InteractionAnnales d’Economie et de Statistique, 34
Dennis Gärtner (2010)
Monopolistic Screening under Learning By DoingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 41
J. Laffont, J. Tirole (1988)
THE DYNAMICS OF INCENTIVE CONTRACTSEconometrica, 56
D. Baron, David Besanko (1984)
Regulation and information in a continuing relationshipInformation Economics and Policy, 1
A. Pavan, Ilya Segal, Juuso Toikka (2009)
Dynamic Mechanism Design: Incentive Compatibility, Profit Maximization and Information DisclosureERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)
J. Laffont, D. Martimort (2001)
The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model
T. Lewis, D. Sappington (1992)
Incentives for Conservation and Quality-Improvement by Public UtilitiesThe American Economic Review, 82
Boston Library, J. Laffont, J. Tirole
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Working Paper Department of Economics M. |dec 21 Provision of Quality and Power of Incentive Schemes in Regulated Industries
T. Lewis, H. Yildirim (2002)
Learning by Doing and Dynamic RegulationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 33
T. Lewis, D. Sappington (1991)
Incentives for Monitoring QualityThe RAND Journal of Economics, 22
E. McGlynn, S. Asch, J. Adams, J. Keesey, Jennifer Hicks, A. DeCristofaro, E. Kerr (2003)
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.The New England journal of medicine, 348 26
M. Shirley (1998)
Regulatory reform: Economic analysis and British experience : Mark Armstrong, Simon Cowan and John Vickers, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994, 392 ppInformation Economics and Policy, 10
Nancy Stokey, R. Lucas, E. Prescott (1989)
Recursive methods in economic dynamics
We develop a dynamic regulation model of quality provision where maintenance efforts and quality shocks have a durable impact. When the regulator contracts with a sequence of agents, asymmetric information can lead to overprovision of quality, reflecting a dynamic rent extraction effect. When the regulator contracts with a single agent, the efficiency of their relationship depends on the regulator’s ability to transfer rents across periods. Hiring a single agent with unlimited liability is socially preferable to hiring a sequence of agents, even when no commitment is feasible. By contrast, shorter franchises are socially preferable if the agent has limited liability.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.