Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Economic Issues Are Moral Issues 2: Attributing Blame for Inequality Occurring in the United States versus Foreign Countries

Economic Issues Are Moral Issues 2: Attributing Blame for Inequality Occurring in the United... Moral appeals consistent with an individual's values affect their propensity to take action against inequality and its deleterious effects. Accordingly, moral foundations such as harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, or purity concerns could also affect perceptions of inequality and attributions regarding who is to blame for it. For instance, individuals high in loyalty concerns, who are typically more conservative, may show in‐group favoritism toward their own country by expressing less moral judgment of inequality in their own country versus other countries. Further, research germane to the belief in a just world has shown that conservatives are more likely to blame the poor for their poverty. The current research investigated the degree to which participants’ moral reactions to a high degree of economic inequality are influenced by the country in which that inequality exists as well as the degree to which liberals (Democrats) versus conservatives (Republicans) blame inequality on different target groups. A mixed‐design experiment tested participants’ degree of blame for equality across all targets (the poor, the rich, corporations, the government) for one of three randomly assigned countries (the United States, Australia, or China). Results were consistent with predictions related to moral concerns and ideological differences in attributions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy Wiley

Economic Issues Are Moral Issues 2: Attributing Blame for Inequality Occurring in the United States versus Foreign Countries

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/economic-issues-are-moral-issues-2-attributing-blame-for-inequality-8znl9dgE0x
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2020 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
ISSN
1529-7489
eISSN
1530-2415
DOI
10.1111/asap.12190
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Moral appeals consistent with an individual's values affect their propensity to take action against inequality and its deleterious effects. Accordingly, moral foundations such as harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, or purity concerns could also affect perceptions of inequality and attributions regarding who is to blame for it. For instance, individuals high in loyalty concerns, who are typically more conservative, may show in‐group favoritism toward their own country by expressing less moral judgment of inequality in their own country versus other countries. Further, research germane to the belief in a just world has shown that conservatives are more likely to blame the poor for their poverty. The current research investigated the degree to which participants’ moral reactions to a high degree of economic inequality are influenced by the country in which that inequality exists as well as the degree to which liberals (Democrats) versus conservatives (Republicans) blame inequality on different target groups. A mixed‐design experiment tested participants’ degree of blame for equality across all targets (the poor, the rich, corporations, the government) for one of three randomly assigned countries (the United States, Australia, or China). Results were consistent with predictions related to moral concerns and ideological differences in attributions.

Journal

Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley

Published: Dec 1, 2020

References

  • Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?
    Alesina, A.; Di Tella, R.; MacCulloch, R.
  • Social class and policy preferences: Implications for economic inequality and interclass relations
    Bullock, H. E.
  • Predicting support for eliminating the dividend tax: The role of framing and attributions for wealth
    Bullock, H. E.; Fernald, J. L.
  • Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality
    Bullock, H. E.; Williams, W. R.; Limbert, W. M.
  • Income inequality and homicide rates in Canada and the United States
    Daly, M.; Wilson, M.; Vasdev, S.
  • The global pattern of household wealth
    Davies, J. B.; Sandstrom, S.; Shorrocks, A.; Wolff, E. N.
  • The perceived relationship between the belief in a just world and sociopolitical ideology
    Dittmar, H.; Dickinson, J.
  • What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them
    Eriksson, K.; Simpson, B.
  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses
    Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.‐G.
  • Using moral foundations to predict voting behavior: Regression models from the 2012 U.S. presidential election
    Franks, A. S.; Scherr, K. C.
  • Economic issues are moral issues: The moral underpinnings of the desire to reduce wealth inequality
    Franks, A. S.; Scherr, K. C.
  • Godless by association: Deficits in trust mediate antiatheist stigma‐by‐association
    Franks, A. S.; Scherr, K. C.; Gibson, B.
  • Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain
    Furnham, A.
  • Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor
    Furnham, A.; Gunter, B.
  • Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations
    Graham, J.; Haidt, J.; Nosek, B. A.
  • Mind perception is the essence of morality
    Gray, K.; Young, L.; Waytz, A.
  • African American, Hispanic, and White beliefs about Black/White inequality
    Hunt, M. O.
  • Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis
    Hayes, A. F.
  • The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty
    Hunt, M.; Bullock, H. E.
  • Ideology‐specific patterns of moral indifference predict intentions not to vote
    Johnson, K. M.; Iyer, R.; Wojcik, S. P.; Vaisey, S.; Miles, A.; Chu, V.; Graham, J.
  • Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
    Jost, J. T.; Glaser, J.; Kruglanski, W.; Sulloway, F. J.
  • How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay
    Kiatpongsan, S.; Norton, M. I.
  • Evaluations of performance as a function of performers reward and attractiveness
    Lerner, M.
  • Economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss
    Mikkelson, G. M.; Gonzalez, A.; Peterson, G. D.
  • Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism: Tests of Dovidio and Gaertner's (1998) integrated model
    Nail, P. R.; Harton, H. C.; Decker, B. P.
  • Consensus on building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time
    Norton, M.; Ariely, D.
  • American's desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them
    Norton, M.; Ariely, D.
  • The not‐so‐common‐ wealth of Australia: Evidence for a cross‐cultural desire for a more equal distribution of wealth
    Norton, M. I.; Neal, D. T.; Govan, C. L.; Ariely, D.; Holland, E.
  • Income inequality and solidarity in Europe
    Paskov, M.; Dewilde, C.
  • The infection of bad company: Stigma by association
    Pryor, J. B.; Reeder, G. D.; Monroe, A. E.
  • The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm
    Schein, C.; Gray, K.
  • Economic inequality and democratic political engagement
    Solt, F.
  • The spirit level. Why more equal societies almost always do better
    Wilkinson, R. G.; Pickett, K. E.
  • How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory
    Winterich, K. P.; Zhang, Y.; Mittal, V.
  • Top heavy: The increasing inequality of wealth in American and what can be done about it
    Wolff, E. N.
  • Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis
    Zucker, G. S.; Weiner, B.