Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes

Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes A steep decline in biologically based racial animus over the past four decades has not led to a softening of opposition to race‐conscious policies such as affirmative action. One explanation for this is that a new racial belief system—referred to as symbolic racism or racial resentment—has replaced “old‐fashioned racism.” Another is that nonracial values such as ideology and a preference for small government now drive policy opinions. Our theory suggests that whereas disgust once accompanied ideas about “biologically inferior” groups, anger has become fused to conservative ideas about race in the contemporary period. As a result, anger now serves as the primary emotional trigger of whites’ negative racial attitudes. We experimentally induce disgust, anger, or fear using an apolitical task and find anger is uniquely powerful at boosting opposition to racially redistributive policies among white racial conservatives. Nonracial attitudes such as ideology and small government preference are not activated by any of these negative emotions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Political Science Wiley

Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/emotional-substrates-of-white-racial-attitudes-1MKwyvnrP3
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2012, Midwest Political Science Association
ISSN
0092-5853
eISSN
1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00561.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A steep decline in biologically based racial animus over the past four decades has not led to a softening of opposition to race‐conscious policies such as affirmative action. One explanation for this is that a new racial belief system—referred to as symbolic racism or racial resentment—has replaced “old‐fashioned racism.” Another is that nonracial values such as ideology and a preference for small government now drive policy opinions. Our theory suggests that whereas disgust once accompanied ideas about “biologically inferior” groups, anger has become fused to conservative ideas about race in the contemporary period. As a result, anger now serves as the primary emotional trigger of whites’ negative racial attitudes. We experimentally induce disgust, anger, or fear using an apolitical task and find anger is uniquely powerful at boosting opposition to racially redistributive policies among white racial conservatives. Nonracial attitudes such as ideology and small government preference are not activated by any of these negative emotions.

Journal

American Journal of Political Science – Wiley

Published: Apr 1, 2012

References

  • “The Development of Stereotypes Concerning the Negro
    Blake, Blake; Dennis, Dennis
  • “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position
    Blumer, Blumer
  • “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer's Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context
    Bobo, Bobo; Hutchings, Hutchings
  • “Mood and Memory
    Bower, Bower
  • “The BIAS Map: Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes
    Cuddy, Cuddy; Fiske, Fiske; Glick, Glick
  • “Prejudice from Thin Air: The Effect of Emotion on Automatic Intergroup Attitudes
    DeSteno, DeSteno; Dasgupta, Dasgupta; Bartlett, Bartlett; Cajdric, Cajdric
  • “Facial Expression and Emotion
    Ekman, Ekman
  • “On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice
    Huddy, Huddy; Feldman, Feldman
  • “Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Politics
    Huddy, Huddy; Feldman, Feldman; Tabler, Tabler; Lahav, Lahav
  • “Terror and Ethnocentrism: Foundations of American Support for the War on Terrorism
    Kam, Kam; Kinder, Kinder
  • “On the Fading of Social Stereotypes: Studies in Three Generations of College Students
    Karlins, Karlins; Coffman, Coffman; Walters, Walters
  • “Racial Stereotypes of One Hundred College Students
    Katz, Katz; Braly, Braly
  • “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life
    Kinder, Kinder; Sears, Sears
  • “Fear, Anger and Risk
    Lerner, Lerner; Keltner, Keltner
  • “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger's Influence on Cognition
    Lerner, Lerner; Tiedens, Tiedens
  • “Intergroup Emotions: Explaining Offensive Action Tendencies in an Intergroup Context
    Mackie, Mackie; Devos, Devos; Smith, Smith
  • “Symbolic Racism
    McConahay, McConahay; Hough, Hough
  • “A Perspective on Disgust
    Rozin, Rozin; Fallon, Fallon
  • The Origins of Symbolic Racism.
    Sears, Sears; Henry, Henry
  • “Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion
    Smith, Smith; Ellsworth, Ellsworth
  • Reflections on American Racism.
    Sniderman, Sniderman; Tetlock, Tetlock
  • “Ad Seen as Playing to Racial Fears
    Toner, Toner
  • Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.
    Valentino, Valentino; Hutchings, Hutchings; Banks, Banks; Davis, Davis
  • “Cues That Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns
    Valentino, Valentino; Hutchings, Hutchings; White, White
  • “Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South
    Valentino, Valentino; Sears, Sears