Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Employment Protection and Unemployment Benefits: On Technology Adoption and Job Creation in a Matching Model

Employment Protection and Unemployment Benefits: On Technology Adoption and Job Creation in a... We analyse the effects of different labour‐market policies (employment protection, unemployment benefits, and payroll taxes) on job creation and technology choices in a model where firms are matched with workers of different productivity and wages are determined by ex post bargaining. The model is characterized by two intertwined sources of inefficiency, namely a matching externality and a hold‐up externality associated with the bargaining strength of workers. The results depend on the relative importance of the two externalities and on worker risk aversion. “Flexicurity”, meaning low employment protection and generous unemployment insurance, can be optimal if workers are sufficiently risk‐averse and the hold‐up problem is relatively important. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Scandinavian Journal of Economics Wiley

Employment Protection and Unemployment Benefits: On Technology Adoption and Job Creation in a Matching Model

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/employment-protection-and-unemployment-benefits-on-technology-adoption-SGKgSdZrQU

References (65)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2018 The editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
ISSN
0347-0520
eISSN
1467-9442
DOI
10.1111/sjoe.12244
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We analyse the effects of different labour‐market policies (employment protection, unemployment benefits, and payroll taxes) on job creation and technology choices in a model where firms are matched with workers of different productivity and wages are determined by ex post bargaining. The model is characterized by two intertwined sources of inefficiency, namely a matching externality and a hold‐up externality associated with the bargaining strength of workers. The results depend on the relative importance of the two externalities and on worker risk aversion. “Flexicurity”, meaning low employment protection and generous unemployment insurance, can be optimal if workers are sufficiently risk‐averse and the hold‐up problem is relatively important.

Journal

The Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ;

There are no references for this article.