Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fanon's Mobilities: Race, Space, Recognition

Fanon's Mobilities: Race, Space, Recognition This article engages with Frantz Fanon's writing on both geographical and dialectical movement. It suggests that in particular historical‐geographical contexts—such as those described by Fanon himself—geographical patterns of mobility and confinement operate as the presupposition and result of “race”; while also functionally enabling capitalism's necessary and enduring dialectic of appropriation and capitalisation, and reproducing the Fanonian “zone of nonbeing”. More simply, this article suggests that in certain conjunctures the tight articulation of race, mobility, and capital accumulation inhibits the reciprocal recognition of equals. In those contexts, a spatialised “counter‐ontological” politics is the only means of establishing intersubjective symmetry and the preconditions for Fanon's “new humanism”. This article concretises these arguments in relation to historical work on antebellum “carceral landscapes”. It concludes by drawing explicitly on Stuart Hall's reflections on articulation and “lines of tendential force” in order to think through the relevance of Fanonian theorisation today. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Antipode Wiley

Fanon's Mobilities: Race, Space, Recognition

Antipode , Volume 55 (4) – Jul 1, 2023

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/fanon-s-mobilities-race-space-recognition-VitMp7fQFE

References (45)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Antipode © 2023 Antipode Foundation Ltd
ISSN
0066-4812
eISSN
1467-8330
DOI
10.1111/anti.12922
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article engages with Frantz Fanon's writing on both geographical and dialectical movement. It suggests that in particular historical‐geographical contexts—such as those described by Fanon himself—geographical patterns of mobility and confinement operate as the presupposition and result of “race”; while also functionally enabling capitalism's necessary and enduring dialectic of appropriation and capitalisation, and reproducing the Fanonian “zone of nonbeing”. More simply, this article suggests that in certain conjunctures the tight articulation of race, mobility, and capital accumulation inhibits the reciprocal recognition of equals. In those contexts, a spatialised “counter‐ontological” politics is the only means of establishing intersubjective symmetry and the preconditions for Fanon's “new humanism”. This article concretises these arguments in relation to historical work on antebellum “carceral landscapes”. It concludes by drawing explicitly on Stuart Hall's reflections on articulation and “lines of tendential force” in order to think through the relevance of Fanonian theorisation today.

Journal

AntipodeWiley

Published: Jul 1, 2023

Keywords: Frantz Fanon; world‐ecology; mobility; immobility; dialectics; Stuart Hall

There are no references for this article.