Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Stuart Gillan, Jay Hartzell, L. Starks (2003)
Explaining Corporate Governance: Boards, Bylaws, and Charter ProvisionsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Zhang Zhang (2007)
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44
(2009)
Delaware Law Changes to Facilitate Voluntary Adoption of Proxy Access and Reimbursement Policy for Proxy Contests
Chhaochharia Chhaochharia, Grinstein Grinstein (2007)
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of the 2002 Governance RulesJournal of Finance, 62
Ali Akyol, W. Lim, P. Verwijmeren (2012)
Shareholders in the Boardroom: Wealth Effects of the SEC’s Proposal to Facilitate Director NominationsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47
Core Core, Guay Guay, Rusticus Rusticus (2006)
Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors’ ExpectationsJournal of Finance, 61
L. Bebchuk (2003)
The Case for Increasing Shareholder PowerCGA: Interests
Sunil Wahal (1996)
Pension Fund Activism and Firm PerformanceJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31
Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, S. Rego (2008)
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings ManagementThe Journal of Law and Economics, 51
Bebchuk (2005)
The Costs of Entrenched BoardsJournal of Financial Economics, 78
L. Bebchuk, Alma Cohen (2004)
The Costs of Entrenched BoardsLSN: Corporate Law (Topic)
Rezaee Rezaee, Jain Jain (2006)
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early EvidenceContemporary Accounting Research, 23
Benjamin Hermalin (2003)
Trends in Corporate GovernanceIO: Firm Structure
J. Core, W. Guay, T. Rusticus (2004)
Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors' ExpectationsCorporate Finance: Governance
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1996)
A Survey of Corporate GovernanceOrganizations & Markets eJournal
Ellen Engel, Rachel Hayes, Xue Wang (2004)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private DecisionsFinancial Accounting
Z. Rezaee, P. Jain (2005)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early EvidenceFinancial Accounting
Shleifer Shleifer, Vishny Vishny (1997)
A Survey of Corporate GovernanceJournal of Finance, 52
Mark Defond, Rebecca Hann, Xuesong Hu (2004)
Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?Institutional & Transition Economics eJournal
Utpal Bhattacharya, Peter Groznik, Bruce Haslem (2004)
Is CEO Certification Credible?Corporate Finance: Governance
K. Schipper, Rex Thompson (1983)
THE IMPACT OF MERGER-RELATED REGULATIONS ON THE SHAREHOLDERS OF ACQUIRING FIRMSJournal of Accounting Research, 21
Core Core, Guay Guay (2002)
Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and VolatilityJournal of Accounting Research, 40
M. Harris, A. Raviv (2008)
A Theory of Board Control and SizeIO: Firm Structure
Bainbridge (2006)
Director Primacy and Shareholder DisempowermentHarvard Law Review, 119
D. Larcker, G. Ormazabal, Daniel Taylor (2010)
The Market Reaction to Corporate Governance RegulationCGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)
D. Yermack (1996)
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
Stephen Bainbridge (2005)
Director Primacy and Shareholder DisempowermentCorporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law
Yermack Yermack (1996)
Higher Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of DirectorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
I. Zhang (2007)
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Corporate Finance: Governance
Coles Coles, Daniel Daniel, Naveen Naveen (2008)
Boards: Does One Size Fit AllJournal of Financial Economics, 87
Randall Heron, E. Lie (2006)
On the Use of Poison Pills and Defensive Payouts by Takeover TargetsKelley: Finance (Topic)
Jie Cai, Ralph Walkling (2008)
Shareholders’ Say on Pay: Does It Create Value?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46
Brian Bushee, C. Leuz (2004)
Economic Consequences of Sec Disclosure Regulation: Evidence from the OTC Bulletin BoardCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
Stephan Sefcik, Rex Thompson (1986)
AN APPROACH TO STATISTICAL-INFERENCE IN CROSS-SECTIONAL MODELS WITH SECURITY ABNORMAL RETURNS AS DEPENDENT VARIABLEJournal of Accounting Research, 24
Vidhi Chhaochharia, Yaniv Grinstein (2007)
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance RulesSamuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University Research Paper Series
H. DeAngelo, Edward Rice (1983)
Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealthJournal of Financial Economics, 11
Comment Comment, Schwert Schwert (1995)
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrence and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover MeasuresJournal of Financial Economics, 39
J. Coles, Naveen Daniel, L. Naveen (2005)
Boards: Does One Size Fit All?Drexel University LeBow College of Business Research Paper Series
Robert Comment, G. Schwert (1993)
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover MeasuresDiversification Strategy & Policy eJournal
E. Dimson (1979)
Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent tradingJournal of Financial Economics, 7
Adams (2007)
A Theory of Friendly BoardsJournal of Finance, 62
(2006)
Court Rules Shareholders Can Put Dissidents on Co Proxies
Bushee Bushee, Leuz Leuz (2005)
Economic Consequences of SEC Disclosure Regulation: Evidence from the OTC Bulletin BoardJournal of Accounting and Economics, 39
Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, S. Rego (2006)
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings ManagementKelley: Accounting (Topic)
W. Guay, J. Core (2002)
Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and VolatilityFinancial Accounting
P. Jain, Z. Rezaee (2006)
The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and Capital‐Market Behavior: Early Evidence*Contemporary Accounting Research, 23
DeFond DeFond, Hann Hann, Hu Hu (2005)
Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?Journal of Accounting Research, 43
Engel Engel, Hayes Hayes, Wang Wang (2006)
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and Firms’ Going‐Private DecisionsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 44
Renée Adams, Daniel Ferreira (2007)
A Theory of Friendly BoardsCorporate Finance: Governance
We examine the wealth effects of the Security and Exchange Commission's (SEC) recent proxy access rule to facilitate director nominations by shareholders. We focus on how a firm's governance characteristics affect the market reaction to the rule. We find more negative announcement effects for firms with high probabilities of being targeted by shareholders. The announcement effects of the proxy access rule are positively related to the fraction of independent directors and the ratio of non‐cash‐based compensation, while announcement effects are inversely correlated with board size. Our findings suggest that the marginal shareholder does not perceive the proposed rule as value increasing.
International Review of Finance – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.