Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/hawks-in-the-making-european-public-views-on-nuclear-weapons-post-1Y6t1jN9pg
References (87)
-
Michal Smetana, M. Onderco, Tom Etienne (2021)
Do Germany and the Netherlands want to say goodbye to US nuclear weapons?Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 77
-
Yuval Feinstein (2020)
Applying Sociological Theories of Emotions to the Study of Mass Politics: The Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon in the United States as a Test CaseThe Sociological Quarterly, 61
-
Benjamin Page, R. Shapiro (1992)
The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences -
M. Onderco, Michal Smetana, Sico Meer, Tom Etienne (2021)
When do the Dutch want to join the nuclear ban treaty? Findings of a public opinion survey in the NetherlandsThe Nonproliferation Review, 28
-
Harald Müller, Carmen Wunderlich (2018)
Not lost in contestation: How norm entrepreneurs frame norm development in the nuclear nonproliferation regimeContemporary Security Policy, 39
-
S. Theiss (2016)
Evolution Of Nuclear Strategy -
R.S. Erikson, M. MacKuen, J.A. Stimson (2002)
The macro polity -
S.D. Biddle, P. Feaver (1989)
Battlefield nuclear weapons: issues and options -
E.G. Carmines, J.A. Stimson (1989)
Issue evolution: race and the transformation of American politics -
F.J. Gavin (2015)
Strategies of inhibition: US grand strategy, the nuclear revolution, and nonproliferation, 40
-
A.J. Lambert, J.P. Schott, L. Scherer (2011)
Threat, politics, and attitudes: toward a greater understanding of rally??Round?the?flag effects, 20
-
M. Peffley, J. Hurwitz (1992)
International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs: Public Response to Changing Soviet-U.S. RelationsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 36
-
D.G. Press, S.D. Sagan, B.A. Valentino (2013)
Atomic aversion: experimental evidence on taboos, traditions, and the non?use of nuclear weapons, 107
-
Tobias Bunde (2022)
Lessons (to be) learned? Germany’s Zeitenwende and European security after the Russian invasion of UkraineContemporary Security Policy, 43
-
Jeffrey Lantis (2018)
Nuclear cooperation with non-NPT member states? An elite-driven model of norm contestationContemporary Security Policy, 39
-
W. Wilson (2014)
Five myths about nuclear weapons -
A. Lambert, Laura Scherer, J. Schott, K. Olson, Rick Andrews, T. O'Brien, A. Zisser (2010)
Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: an integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 98 6
-
R. Younis, A. Spilman (2022)
The European security crisis and the future of deterrence (conference report) -
R. Inglehart, J. Rabier, Karlheinz Reif (1987)
The evolution of public attitudes toward european integration: 1970–1986Journal of European Integration, 10
-
M. Smetana (2020)
Nuclear deviance: stigma politics and the rules of the nonproliferation game -
T.W. Smith (1988)
A report: nuclear anxiety, 52
-
Anne Santana (2009)
NUCLEAR WEAPONS AS THE CURRENCY OF POWERThe Nonproliferation Review
-
Thomas Risse-Kappen (1991)
Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal DemocraciesWorld Politics, 43
-
T. Paul (2009)
The tradition of non-use of nuclear weapons -
P. Schulte (2012)
Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO -
Jon Rogowski, P. Tucker (2018)
Critical Events and Attitude Change: Support for Gun Control After Mass ShootingsPolitical Science Research and Methods, 7
-
Michal Smetana, Carmen Wunderlich (2021)
Forum: Nonuse of Nuclear Weapons in World Politics: Toward the Third Generation of “Nuclear Taboo” ResearchInternational Studies Review
-
P. Everts (1985a)
Controversies at home: domestic factors in the foreign policy of The Netherlands -
J.W. Kingdon (2014)
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies -
(2013)
Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: interests, conflicts, and justice -
M. Onderco, Rik Joosen (2022)
Nuclear Weapons in the Tweede Kamer: Analysis of Nuclear Motions in the Dutch House of Representatives in Times of ContestationGlobal Studies Quarterly
-
B. Pelopidas (2017)
The next generation(s) of Europeans facing nuclear weapons: forgetful, indifferent, but supportive? [non?proliferation papers (No 56)] -
F. Sauer (2015)
Atomic anxiety: deterrence, taboo and the non?use of U.S. nuclear weapons -
E. Scarry (2014)
Thermonuclear monarchy: choosing between democracy and doom -
Kjølv Egeland, Benoît Pelopidas (2020)
European nuclear weapons? Zombie debates and nuclear realitiesEuropean Security, 30
-
R.S. Norris, W.M. Arkin, W. Burr (1999)
Where they were, 55
-
Nick Ritchie (2014)
Waiting for Kant: devaluing and delegitimizing nuclear weaponsInternational Affairs, 90
-
Janina Dill, Scott Sagan, B. Valentino (2022)
Kettles of Hawks: Public Opinion on the Nuclear Taboo and Noncombatant Immunity in the United States, United Kingdom, France, and IsraelSecurity Studies, 31
-
O. Holsti (2004)
Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy, Revised Edition -
B. Roberts (2021)
Alliances, nuclear weapons and escalation -
(2015)
Atomic Anxiety -
R.D. Gibbons (2022)
The Hegemon's tool kit -
(2006)
The Foreign Policy Disconnect -
Michal Smetana, M. Onderco (2022)
From Moscow With a Mushroom Cloud? Russian Public Attitudes to the Use of Nuclear Weapons in a Conflict With NATOJournal of Conflict Resolution, 67
-
Nick Ritchie, Ambassador Kmentt (2021)
Universalising the TPNW: Challenges and OpportunitiesJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 4
-
R. Porat, Maya Tamir, Michael Wohl, T. Gur, E. Halperin (2019)
Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threatCognition and Emotion, 33
-
A. Lambert, J. Schott, Laura Scherer (2011)
Threat, Politics, and AttitudesCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 20
-
W. Wilson (2008)
THE MYTH OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCEThe Nonproliferation Review, 15
-
Ondřej Rosendorf, Michal Smetana, M. Vranka (2021)
Disarming Arguments: Public Opinion and Nuclear AbolitionSurvival, 63
-
R.A. Dahl (1985)
Controlling nuclear weapons: democracy versus guardianship -
P. Fuhrhop (2021)
Europe's evolving deterrence discourse -
Nick Ritchie (2010)
Relinquishing Nuclear Weapons: Identities, Networks and the British BombInternational Affairs, 86
-
P. Isernia, Z. Juhász, H. Rattinger (2002)
Foreign Policy and the Rational Public in Comparative PerspectiveJournal of Conflict Resolution, 46
-
H. Mueller, Thomas Risse-Kappen (1987)
Origins of Estrangement: The Peace Movement and the Changed Image of America in West GermanyInternational Security, 12
-
J.E. Mueller (1973)
War, presidents, and public opinion -
M. Onderco, Michal Smetana (2021)
German views on US nuclear weapons in Europe: public and elite perspectivesEuropean Security, 30
-
Michal Smetana, J. O’Mahoney (2021)
NPT as an antifragile system: How contestation improves the nonproliferation regimeContemporary Security Policy, 43
-
T. Sayle (2019)
Enduring Alliance -
Patricia Shamai (2015)
Name and Shame: Unravelling the Stigmatization of Weapons of Mass DestructionContemporary Security Policy, 36
-
L. Considine (2019)
Contests of legitimacy and value: the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and the logic of prohibitionInternational Affairs
-
Michal Smetana (2019)
Nuclear Deviance -
Nick Ritchie (2013)
Valuing and Devaluing Nuclear WeaponsContemporary Security Policy, 34
-
Omid Nouripour (2021)
Multilateral für die EU als Friedensmacht, für Klimaschutz und DemokratieZeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik, 14
-
N. Tannenwald (2018)
How Strong Is the Nuclear Taboo Today?The Washington Quarterly, 41
-
N. Tannenwald (2005)
Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear TabooInternational Security, 29
-
C.M. Kelleher (1975)
Germany and the politics of nuclear weapons -
Tom Smith (1988)
THE POLLS—A ReportNUCLEAR ANXIETYPublic Opinion Quarterly, 52
-
P. Everts (1985b)
The public and Atlantic defense -
O.R. Holsti (2004)
Public opinion and American foreign policy -
M. Bentley (2022)
A New Model of “Taboo”: Disgust, Stigmatization, and FetishizationInternational Studies Review
-
(1994)
The end of the cold war, attitude change, and the politics of defense spending. PS -
B.I. Page, M.M. Bouton (2006)
The foreign policy disconnect: what Americans want from our leaders but Don't get -
Michal Smetana, M. Onderco (2018)
Bringing the outsiders in: an interactionist perspective on deviance and normative change in international politicsCambridge Review of International Affairs, 31
-
W. Bean (1965)
Issue in Evolution.JAMA Internal Medicine, 115
-
M. Rublee, A. Cohen (2018)
Nuclear norms in global governance: A progressive research agendaContemporary Security Policy, 39
-
J. Durkalec (2018)
The 2018 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review, NATO's Brussels Summit and Beyond -
A. Mercer, A. Lau, C. Kennedy (2018)
For weighting online opt?In samples, what matters Most? -
Michal Smetana, M. Onderco (2022)
Elite-Public Gaps in Attitudes to Nuclear Weapons: New Evidence from a Survey of German Citizens and ParliamentariansInternational Studies Quarterly
-
Joshua Kertzer (2020)
Re‐Assessing Elite‐Public Gaps in Political BehaviorAmerican Journal of Political Science
-
N. Tannenwald (2018)
The Vanishing Nuclear TabooForeign Affairs
-
N. Tannenwald (2002)
The nuclear taboo the United States and the non?use of nuclear weapons since 1945 -
Stephen Herzog, J. Baron, R. Gibbons (2021)
Antinormative Messaging, Group Cues, and the Nuclear Ban TreatyThe Journal of Politics, 84
-
W. Walker (2000)
Nuclear Order and DisorderInternational Affairs, 76
-
Naomi Egel, S. Ward (2022)
Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear orderEuropean Journal of International Relations, 28
-
R.C. Eichenberg (1994)
Public opinion and National Security in Western Europe: consensus lost? -
Hans Kristensen, Matt Korda (2022)
United States nuclear weapons, 2022Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 78
-
R. Gibbons (2018)
The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear WeaponsThe Nonproliferation Review, 25
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2023 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- ISSN
- 1758-5880
- eISSN
- 1758-5899
- DOI
- 10.1111/1758-5899.13179
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
In the past, the European public has not been enthusiastic about nuclear deterrence and the stationing of US American nuclear weapons in Europe. Has the Russian invasion of Ukraine changed that aversion? We conducted a unique study, surveying the same population of respondents at two points in time—in September 2020 and in June 2022. We find that European respondents became much more hawkish after the invasion: nuclear deterrence was viewed more favourably, the willingness to use nuclear weapons increased, and support for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons dropped significantly. The paper draws a number of policy implications from these results.
Journal
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2023