Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Orams (1994)
Tourism and Marine Wildlife: The Wild Dolphins of Tangalooma, Australia: A Case ReportAnthrozoos, 7
D. Duffus, P. Dearden (1990)
Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: a conceptual framework.Biological Conservation, 53
S. Mallick, M. Driessen (2003)
Feeding of wildlife: How effective are the ‘Keep Wildlife Wild’ signs in Tasmania's National Parks?Ecological Management and Restoration, 4
J. Altmann (1974)
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Behaviour, 49 3
Orams Orams (1995)
Development and management of a feeding program for wild bottlenose dolphins at Tangalooma, AustraliaAquatic Mammals, 21
P. Reynolds, D. Braithwaite (2001)
Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourismTourism Management, 22
Anna Lewis, D. Newsome (2003)
Planning for stingray tourism at Hamelin Bay, Western Australia: the importance of stakeholder perspectivesInternational Journal of Tourism Research, 5
M. Orams (1998)
Marine Tourism: Development, Impacts and Management
M. Kingsford, C. Battershill (2000)
Studying temperate marine environments : a handbook for ecologists
Orams Orams (1994)
Tourism and marine wildlife: the dolphins of Tangalooma, AustraliaAnthrozoos, 7
D. Nelson, R. Johnson, J. Mckibben, G. Pittenger (1986)
Agonistic attacks on divers and submersibles by gray reef sharks, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos: antipredatory or competitive?Bulletin of Marine Science, 38
Perrine Perrine (1989)
Reef fish feeding; amusement or nuisance?Sea Frontiers, 35
M. Shackley (1998)
'Stingray City'- Managing the Impact of Underwater Tourism in the Cayman IslandsJournal of Sustainable Tourism, 6
R. Bakeman, J. Gottman (1986)
Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis
Semeniuk Semeniuk, Dill Dill (2002)
Costs and benefits of grouped and solitary resting in the cowtail stingray, Pastinachus sephen , in Shark Bay, Western AustraliaIntegrated and Comparative Biology, 42
Ronda Green, K. Higginbottom (2000)
The effects of non-consumptive wildlife tourism on free-ranging wildlifePacific Conservation Biology, 6
M. Orams (2002)
Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: a review of issues and impactsTourism Management, 23
L. Taylor, T. Tricas (1997)
Sharks and Rays
Green Green, Higginbottom Higginbottom (2000)
The effects of non?consumptive wildlife tourismon free?ranging wildlife: a reviewPacific Conservation Biology, 6
Interacting with stingrays at Hamelin Bay, in the south‐west of Western Australia, appears to be substantially growing in popularity. Promotion of the rays is increasing through websites and brochures and larger tourism productions, such as the ‘Getaway’ television programme, have shown interest in the Hamelin Bay site. Yet there is still very little known about the impacts on rays (both behavioural and physical), risks to humans, or indeed the issues that provisioning stingrays can present. Although Shackley (1998) conducted an impact study of stingray provisioning in the Cayman Islands, provisioning activities at Hamelin Bay, and other areas in the southwest are unique because they are shore‐based. As part of developing a profile of conditions at the Hamelin Bay provisioning site we investigated stingray numbers and their distribution in the area. We also collected data on the type and amount of provisioned food, investigated stingray behaviour and observed how tourists interacted with stingrays. It was shown through site profile data that rays are attracted to the site principally by food provisioning and secondarily by boats due to learned association with food. They are most common at the provisioning site in the middle of the day, as are peak visitor numbers. Behavioural impacts on rays were found to be attraction to humans, resulting in aggression and hierarchy towards one another. Attraction to humans at the provisioning site reflected that the rays may be partially habituated. However, rays were also seen foraging naturally for food, indicating that they are not yet dependent on humans. Other potential impacts to rays include boat damage from pleasure craft, overfeeding, being fed the wrong food, damage from fishing hooks and risk of disease from foul water. Lesions on skin and permanent shoaling behaviour, as witnessed at other stingray provisioning sites, were not observed at Hamelin Bay. Management actions are recommended to reduce impacts on the rays, eliminate risks to visitors and increase visitor satisfaction. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Tourism Research – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.