Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Marx Marx, Matthews Matthews (2000)
Dynamic Voluntary Contribution to a Public ProjectReview of Economic Studies, 67
Green Green, Porter Porter (1984)
Non‐cooperative Collusion under Imperfect InformationEconometrica, 52
Barro Barro, Gordon Gordon (1983)
Rules, Discretion, and Reputation in a Model of Monetary PolicyJournal of Monetary Policy, 12
Cason Cason, Friedman Friedman (1999)
Learning in a Laboratory Market with Random Supply and DemandExperimental Economics, 2
Grossman Grossman, Huyck Huyck (1988)
Sovereign Debt as a Contingent Claim: Excusable Default, Repudiation, and ReputationAmerican Economic Review, 78
Kalai Kalai, Lehrer Lehrer (1993)
Rational Learning Leads to Nash EquilibriumEconometrica, 61
Abreu Abreu (1986)
Extremal Equilibria of Oligopolistic SupergamesJournal of Economic Theory, 39
Friedman Friedman (1967)
An Experimental Study of Cooperative DuopolyEconometrica, 35
Ellison Ellison (1994)
Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive CommitteeRAND Journal of Economics, 25
Folmer Folmer, Mouche Mouche, Ragland Ragland (1993)
Interconnected Games and International Environmental ProblemsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 3
Alger Alger (1987)
Laboratory Tests of Equilibrium Predictions with Disequilibrium DataReview of Economic Studies, 54
Bernheim Bernheim, Whinston Whinston (1990)
Multimarket Contact and Collusive BehaviorRAND Journal of Economics, 21
Haltiwanger Haltiwanger, Harrington Harrington (1991)
The Impact of Cyclical Demand on Collusive BehaviorRAND Journal of Economics, 22
Cason Cason, Mason Mason (1999)
Uncertainty, Information Sharing and Collusion in Laboratory Duopoly MarketsEconomic Inquiry, 37
Levinthal Levinthal, March March (1993)
The Myopia of LearningStrategic Management Journal, 14
Abreu Abreu (1988)
On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games with DiscountingEconometrica, 56
Cheung Cheung, Friedman Friedman (1997)
Individual Learning in Games: Some Laboratory ResultsGames and Economic Behavior, 19
Cooperative equilibria can be supported in a repeated game when players use trigger strategies. This paper tests how well trigger strategies explain behavior in two‐person experimental games. Reducing payoffs for choices larger than the Cournot level induces smaller average outputs, behavior generally consistent with trigger strategy models. Reducing payoffs for choices well above the Cournot level will not affect behavior if actions are consistent with a trigger strategy involving longer‐lived, less intense punishment phases (the grim‐reaper strategy), but would matter for trigger strategies with short‐lived but intense punishment phases. Results show that behavior is most consistent with the former.
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.