Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs

Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs Introduced species represent an accelerated global change, and current efforts to manage them, though effective in particular situations, are not controlling the general problem. In the US, this failure is the result of insufficient policy, inadequate research and management funding, and gaps in scientific knowledge. Comparative policy analysis is urgently needed; the main US shortcoming is the absence of a coherent set of policies to address the entire issue, rather than individual invaders. Deliberate introductions should be more stringently regulated and risk assessments must become more predictive. Monitoring and attempts to identify new invasions (both deliberate and inadvertent) are technically feasible but not sufficiently funded and coordinated. Techniques to manage established invaders have often succeeded, but have been hamstrung by inconsistent funding. All of these problems could be improved by more fundamental research, ranging from basic natural history and simple advances in control technologies to more sophisticated ecological modeling and remote sensing techniques. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Wiley

Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/introduced-species-policy-management-and-future-research-needs-8A1jV0pbKW

References (113)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© Ecological Society of America
ISSN
1540-9295
eISSN
1540-9309
DOI
10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0012:ISPMAF]2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Introduced species represent an accelerated global change, and current efforts to manage them, though effective in particular situations, are not controlling the general problem. In the US, this failure is the result of insufficient policy, inadequate research and management funding, and gaps in scientific knowledge. Comparative policy analysis is urgently needed; the main US shortcoming is the absence of a coherent set of policies to address the entire issue, rather than individual invaders. Deliberate introductions should be more stringently regulated and risk assessments must become more predictive. Monitoring and attempts to identify new invasions (both deliberate and inadvertent) are technically feasible but not sufficiently funded and coordinated. Techniques to manage established invaders have often succeeded, but have been hamstrung by inconsistent funding. All of these problems could be improved by more fundamental research, ranging from basic natural history and simple advances in control technologies to more sophisticated ecological modeling and remote sensing techniques.

Journal

Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.