Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Stobo‐Wilson, B. Murphy, T. Cremona, S. Carthew, S. Levick (2020)
Illuminating den‐tree selection by an arboreal mammal using terrestrial laser scanning in northern AustraliaRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 7
Kristina Cockle, Kathy Martin, Tomasz Wesołowski (2011)
Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwideFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9
A. Hudak, E. Strand, L. Vierling, John Byrne, J. Eitel, S. Martinuzzi, M. Falkowski (2012)
Quantifying aboveground forest carbon pools and fluxes from repeat LiDAR surveysRemote Sensing of Environment, 123
S. Healey, W. Cohen, Zhiqiang Yang, O. Krankina (2005)
Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detectionRemote Sensing of Environment, 97
(2018)
CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute
(2017)
The first Minnesota breeding bird atlas
B. Wing, M. Ritchie, K. Boston, W. Cohen, M. Olsen (2015)
Individual snag detection using neighborhood attribute filtered airborne lidar dataRemote Sensing of Environment, 163
J. Berdeen, E.J. Zlonis, J. Corcoran, R. Deo, M.D. Nelson (2020)
Wildlife research summaries
Jeff Evans (2015)
Random Forests Model Selection and Performance Evaluation
D. Stojanovic, A.J. Koch, M. Webb, R. Cunningham, D. Roshier, R. Heinsohn (2014)
Validation of a landscape?scale planning tool for cavity?dependent wildlife: testing a conservation?planning tool, 39
(2012)
Quantifying aboveground a 2021 The Authors
A. Rosenqvist, M. Shimada, N. Ito, Manabu Watanabe (2007)
ALOS PALSAR: A Pathfinder Mission for Global-Scale Monitoring of the EnvironmentIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45
David Morin, Milena Planells, D. Guyon, L. Villard, S. Mérmoz, A. Bouvet, H. Thevenon, J. Dejoux, T. Toan, G. Dedieu (2019)
Estimation and Mapping of Forest Structure Parameters from Open Access Satellite Images: Development of a Generic Method with a Study Case on Coniferous PlantationRemote. Sens., 11
Daniel Wovcha, Aaseng (2011)
Minnesota ’ s native plant community classification : A statewide classification of terrestrial and wetland vegetation based on numerical analysis of plot data
D. Cutler, T. Edwards, K. Beard, Adele Cutler, Kyle Hess, J. Gibson, J. Lawler (2017)
Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of
Zhaofei Fan, Stephen Lee, S. Shifley, F. Thompson, D. Larsen (2004)
Simulating the Effect of Landscape Size and Age Structure on Cavity Tree Density Using a Resampling Technique
L. Korhonen, Christian Salas, Torgrim Østgård, V. Lien, T. Gobakken, E. Næsset (2014)
Predicting the occurrence of large-diameter trees using airborne laser scanningCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 46
J. Denton, C. Roy, G. Soulliere, B. Potter (2012)
Current and projected abundance of potential nest sites for cavity‐nesting ducks in hardwoods of the north central United StatesJournal of Wildlife Management, 76
M. Ellis, Jennifer Taylor, L. Rayner (2015)
Remotely‐sensed foliage cover and ground‐measured stand attributes are complimentary when estimating tree hollow abundances across relictual woodlands in agricultural landscapesEcological Management and Restoration, 16
Julian Frey, T. Asbeck, J. Bauhus (2020)
Predicting Tree-Related Microhabitats by Multisensor Close-Range Remote Sensing Structural Parameters for the Selection of Retention ElementsRemote. Sens., 12
S. Briechle, P. Krzystek, G. Vosselman (2020)
CLASSIFICATION OF TREE SPECIES AND STANDING DEAD TREES BY FUSING UAV-BASED LIDAR DATA AND MULTISPECTRAL IMAGERY IN THE 3D DEEP NEURAL NETWORK POINTNET++ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
J. Vogeler, R. Slesak, P. Fekety, M. Falkowski (2020)
Characterizing over Four Decades of Forest Disturbance in Minnesota, USAForests
J.S. Evans, M.A. Murphy, Z.A. Holden, S.A. Cushman (2011)
Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology
M. Murphy, J. Evans, A. Storfer (2010)
Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics.Ecology, 91 1
S. Martinuzzi, L. Vierling, W. Gould, M. Falkowski, J. Evans, A. Hudak, K. Vierling (2009)
Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitabilityRemote Sensing of Environment, 113
N. Dudinszky, S. Ippi, T. Kitzberger, Gerardo Cerón, V. Ojeda (2021)
Tree size and crown structure explain the presence of cavities required by wildlife in cool-temperate forests of South AmericaForest Ecology and Management, 494
Edmund Zlonis, J. Berdeen, V. St.-Louis (2020)
Forest inventory attributes predict the occurrence of cavities suitable for nesting by Wood Ducks (Aix sponsa)Forest Ecology and Management, 461
J. White, N. Coops, M. Wulder, M. Vastaranta, T. Hilker, P. Tompalski (2016)
Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A ReviewCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42
(1994)
Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) study on timber harvesting and forest management in Minnesota
B. Koch, U. Heyder, H. Weinacker (2006)
Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar dataPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72
I. Newton (1994)
The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: A reviewBiological Conservation, 70
K. Martin, K. Aitken, K. Wiebe (2004)
NEST SITES AND NEST WEBS FOR CAVITY-NESTING COMMUNITIES IN INTERIOR BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA: NEST CHARACTERISTICS AND NICHE PARTITIONING, 106
R. Couronné, Philipp Probst, A. Boulesteix (2018)
Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experimentBMC Bioinformatics, 19
(2017)
North central landscape forest resources plan
T. Wesol̸owski (2007)
Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forestJournal of Ornithology, 148
David Clugston (1999)
Availability of nest cavity trees for wood ducks (Aix sponsa) at Sunkhaze Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, MaineNortheastern Naturalist, 6
(2020)
Wood Duck (Aix sponsa), version 1.0
Michael Joyce, R. Moen (2018)
Accuracy of a Modular GPS/GLONASS Receiver
C. Gleason, J. Im (2011)
A Review of Remote Sensing of Forest Biomass and Biofuel: Options for Small-Area ApplicationsGIScience & Remote Sensing, 48
D. Gilmer, I. Ball, L. Cowardin, J. Mathisen, J. Riehmann (1978)
Natural Cavities Used by Wood Ducks in North-Central MinnesotaJournal of Wildlife Management, 42
(2019)
Development of Innovative cost-saving methodology for forest inventory: environment and natural resources trust fund final report [Internet
J. Berdeen, Edmund Zlonis, J. Corcoran, Ram Deo, M. Nelson (2018)
DEVELOPING METHODOLOGIES FOR PREDICTING THE LOCATIONS OF WOOD DUCK BREEDING HABITAT COMPONENTS IN MINNESOTA
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
K. Vierling, L. Vierling, W. Gould, S. Martinuzzi, R. Clawges (2008)
Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modelingFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6
J. Evans, S. Cushman (2009)
Gradient modeling of conifer species using random forestsLandscape Ecology, 24
(2018)
FUSION/LDV: software for LIDAR data analysis and visualization. Pacific Northwest Research Station
H. Temesgen, T. Barrett, Greg Latta (2008)
Estimating Cavity Tree Abundance Using Nearest Neighbor Imputation Methods for Western Oregon and Washington ForestsSilva Fennica, 42
D. Lindenmayer, W. Laurance, J. Franklin (2012)
Global Decline in Large Old TreesScience, 338
N. Gorelick, Matt Hancher, M. Dixon, S. Ilyushchenko, D. Thau, R. Moore (2017)
Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyoneRemote Sensing of Environment, 202
(1990)
Review of wood duck nest - cavity characteristics
J. Denton, C. Roy, G. Soulliere, B. Potter (2012)
Change in Density of Duck Nest Cavities at Forests in the North Central United StatesJournal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 3
Zhaofei Fan, S. Shifley, M. Spetich, F. Thompson, D. Larsen (2003)
Distribution of cavity trees in midwestern old-growth and second-growth forestsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 33
R. Kennedy, Zhiqiang Yang, N. Gorelick, J. Braaten, Lucas Cavalcante, W. Cohen, S. Healey (2018)
Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth EngineRemote. Sens., 10
(1990)
The history of wood duck management
J. Holmgren, Å. Persson, U. Söderman (2008)
Species identification of individual trees by combining high resolution LiDAR data with multi‐spectral imagesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 29
Ram Deo, R. Froese, M. Falkowski, A. Hudak (2016)
Optimizing Variable Radius Plot Size and LiDAR Resolution to Model Standing Volume in Conifer ForestsCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42
D.R. Cutler, T.C. Edwards, K.H. Beard, A. Cutler, K.T. Hess, J. Gibson (2007)
Random forests for classification in ecology, 88
Fabian Gutzat, C. Dormann (2018)
Decaying trees improve nesting opportunities for cavity‐nesting birds in temperate and boreal forests: A meta‐analysis and implications for retention forestryEcology and Evolution, 8
S. Sesnie, James Mueller, S. Lehnen, Scott Rowin, J. Reidy, F. Thompson (2016)
Airborne laser altimetry and multispectral imagery for modeling Golden-cheeked Warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) densityEcosphere, 7
(2018)
Package “randomForest”: Breiman and Cutler’s Random Forests for Classification and Regression
Rei Hayashi, A. Weiskittel, J. Kershaw (2016)
Influence of Prediction Cell Size on LiDAR-Derived Area-Based Estimates of Total Volume in Mixed-Species and Multicohort Forests in Northeastern North AmericaCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42
R. Hill, A. Wilson, M. George, S. Hinsley (2010)
Mapping tree species in temperate deciduous woodland using time‐series multi‐spectral dataApplied Vegetation Science, 13
2020) raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version
Marius Rüetschi, D. Small, L. Waser (2019)
Rapid Detection of Windthrows Using Sentinel-1 C-Band SAR DataRemote. Sens., 11
(2018)
ArcGIS Desktop
M. Lefsky, W. Cohen, G. Parker, D. Harding (2002)
Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies, 52
K. Martin, J. Eadie (1999)
Nest webs: A community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birdsForest Ecology and Management, 115
Stephen Lee, Zhaofei Fan (2012)
Effect of Spatial Scale on Modeling and Predicting Mean Cavity Tree Density: A Comparison of Modeling MethodsOpen Journal of Forestry, 02
M. Vaillancourt, P. Drapeau, M. Robert, S. Gauthier (2009)
Origin and availability of large cavities for Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica), a species at risk inhabiting the eastern Canadian boreal forest.Avian Conservation and Ecology, 4
G.J. Soulliere (1990)
1988 North American Wood Duck Symposium. Proceedings of the 1988 North American wood duck symposium
L. Pfannmuller, G. Niemi, J. Green, B. Sample, N. Walton, E.J. Zlonis (2017)
The first Minnesota breeding bird atlas (2009?2013)
B. Eskelson, H. Temesgen, T. Barrett (2009)
Estimating cavity tree and snag abundance using negative binomial regression models and nearest neighbor imputation methodsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 39
K. Wiebe (2011)
Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity‐nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: a review of the evidenceJournal of Field Ornithology, 82
J.W. Thomas, R.G. Anderson, C. Maser, E.L. Bull (1979)
Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington USDA Forest Service Agricultural
Chao Chen (2004)
Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data
P. Sousa, A. Farmer (1983)
Habitat Suitability Index Models: Wood duck
Cristina Gómez, J. White, M. Wulder (2016)
Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A reviewIsprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 116
Yntze Hoek, Gabriel Gaona, K. Martin (2017)
The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree‐cavity‐nesting birds of the worldDiversity and Distributions, 23
J. Thomas (1981)
Wildlife habitats in managed forests--the Blue Mountains of Oregon and WashingtonJournal of Wildlife Management, 45
(1983)
American wood duck symposium
(1983)
Cavities in trees in hardwood forests
G.R. Hepp, F.C. Bellrose (2020)
Birds of the World
A.B. Carey (1983)
Snag habitat management symposium
A. Lechner, G. Foody, D. Boyd (2020)
Applications in Remote Sensing to Forest Ecology and ManagementOne Earth
P. Hyde, R. Dubayah, W. Walker, J. Blair, M. Hofton, C. Hunsaker (2006)
Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergyRemote Sensing of Environment, 102
J. Evans, M. Murphy, Z. Holden, S. Cushman (2011)
Modeling Species Distribution and Change Using Random Forest
A. Edworthy, K. Martin (2014)
Long-term dynamics of the characteristics of tree cavities used for nesting by vertebratesForest Ecology and Management, 334
Zhaofei Fan, D. Larsen, S. Shifley, F. Thompson (2003)
Estimating cavity tree abundance by stand age and basal area, Missouri, USAForest Ecology and Management, 179
N.E. Aaseng, J.C. Almendinger, R.P. Dana, D.S. Hanson, M.D. Lee, E.R. Rowe (2011)
Minnesota?s native plant community classification: a statewide classification of terrestrial and wetland vegetation based on numerical analysis of plot data. Biological Report No. 108. Minnesota County Biological Survey, Ecological Land Classification Program, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program
(1975)
Wood duck (Aix sponsa) ecology and management within the green-timber impoundments at Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge
Christopher Owers, R. Kavanagh, E. Bruce (2015)
Remote sensing can locate and assess the changing abundance of hollow-bearing trees for wildlife in Australian native forestsWildlife Research, 41
J. White, M. Wulder, Andrés Varhola, M. Vastaranta, N. Coops, B. Cook, D. Pitt, M. Woods (2013)
A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approachForestry Chronicle, 89
J. Vogeler, W. Cohen (2016)
A review of the role of active remote sensing and data fusion for characterizing forest in wildlife habitat models, 2016
J. Vogeler, Zhiqiang Yang, W. Cohen (2014)
Mapping post-fire habitat characteristics through the fusion of remote sensing toolsRemote Sensing of Environment, 173
(2014)
Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide
Ram Deo, M. Russell, G. Domke, H. Andersen, W. Cohen, C. Woodall (2017)
Evaluating Site-Specific and Generic Spatial Models of Aboveground Forest Biomass Based on Landsat Time-Series and LiDAR Strip Samples in the Eastern USARemote. Sens., 9
D. Stojanović, A. Koch, M. Webb, R. Cunningham, D. Roshier, R. Heinsohn (2014)
Validation of a landscape-scale planning tool for cavity-dependent wildlifeAustral Ecology, 39
Ran Wang, J. Gamon (2019)
Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversityRemote Sensing of Environment
A. Pesonen, M. Maltamo, K. Eerikäinen, P. Packalen (2008)
Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation areaForest Ecology and Management, 255
Andy Liaw, M. Wiener (2007)
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Tree cavities are an essential habitat component for wildlife species across diverse taxa, from insects to large mammals. Many of these species are imperiled by loss of cavities. Further, conservation action is hindered by limited information on the spatial distribution of cavities, largely due to difficulties in developing useful models of their presence or abundance. Accurately predicting the fine‐scale, landscape‐wide, spatial distribution of these important habitat features would greatly benefit conservation measures. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of using remotely sensed data, including LiDAR, multispectral imagery, and SAR, to predict the locations of cavities suitable for nesting Wood Ducks Aix sponsa at fine scales (≤40 × 40 m) and across a broad landscape (~254 000 ha). We used Random Forest models to classify the presence–absence of cavities at four spatial scales of prediction (5, 10, 20, and 40‐m pixels) as well as three groupings of predictor variables (LiDAR‐derived metrics, spatial forest‐inventory variables [derived via LiDAR or imagery], and ancillary remotely sensed data [derived via SAR or imagery]), and then compared the accuracy between models. The 20‐m response‐scale had the highest accuracy. Variables from each of the groupings were important and largely relied on multispectral imagery and LiDAR data. Our final model and predictive map had 84% overall Out of Bag accuracy and, when tested with an independent cavity dataset, correctly identified 80% of trees with suitable cavities as presences. The predictive map can be used by researchers and land‐managers to determine how past management actions have affected cavity availability as well as the locations of habitat complexes for Wood Ducks and, potentially, other secondary‐cavity‐nesting wildlife. In addition, our analysis can serve as a methodological case‐study for cavity‐nesting wildlife in other regions, as the use of remotely sensed data like high‐density LiDAR and multispectral imagery increases.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2022
Keywords: Hollow; LiDAR; multispectral imagery; tree cavity; wildlife habitat
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.