Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Zou, H. Fan (2019)
The political economy of welfare state and the China?Burma relationship, 19
L. Chenyang, S. Shaojun (2018)
China's OBOR initiative and Myanmar's political economy, 51
N. Peng (2019)
Budding INDO?Myanmar relations: rising but limited challenges for China, 50
W. Kemenade (2008)
China, India and the coming ?transition? in Burma, D�tente between China and India the delicate balance of geopolitics in Asia
S. Engh (2016)
India'S Myanmar policy and the ?Sino?Indian great game?, 47
C.‐C. Huang (2015)
Balance of relationship: the essence of Myanmar's China policy, 28
M.L.P. Paribatra (2022)
Myanmar's struggle for survival: vying for autonomy and agency, 35
R.A.I. Johnson (2020)
Decision?making in the arms of a dependent relationship: explaining shifts in importer acquisition patterns of major weapon systems, 1955?2007, 31
J.M. Malik (1997)
Myanmar's role in regional security: pawn or pivot?, 19
J.M. Malik (1994)
Sino?indian rivalry in Myanmar: implications for regional security, 16
D. Brahmachari (2019)
Ethnicity and violent conflicts in northeast India: analysing the trends, 43
K.L. Gjerde (2017)
Russia's turn to Asia:Myanmar seen from Moscow
S. Trivedi (2017)
Weaving the missing links in India?Myanmar relations, 21
S.H. Basit (2018)
India?Myanmar relations and the management of transnational militant threats, 11
D. Kinsella (1998)
Arms transfer dependence and foreign policy conflict, 35
D.J. Lim, Z. Cooper (2015)
Reassessing hedging: the logic of alignment in East Asia, 24
J. Blank, J.D.P. Moroney, A. Rabasa, B. Lin (2015)
Look east, cross black waters
It is commonly assumed that smaller powers are prone to getting trapped and lost in the game of contrasting powers; however, the story of six major powers and their relations with Myanmar over the past 70 years has shown that the smaller party does not always take a passive, victimised position in these relations but can achieve an active, relatively independent position. Myanmar accomplished this position by shielding itself from sanctions from the United States, UK, and Japan using China's assistance; implementing selective trade and investment; and diversifying its weapon suppliers, including Russia and other players in the arms market. In this paper, the data on 70 years of arms transfer are analysed to exemplify the defence policy of Myanmar towards major powers, the bilateral trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) data are used for economic policy, and the three indicators provide a simplified but concise picture of Myanmar's long‐term relations with world major powers. Myanmar is a relatively small power in the global landscape of larger powers, but it has maintained its independence in policy making and has made full use of the competition for power among major powers for its own benefit. Thus, it is not the big fish but the small one that has helped shape Myanmar's relations with major powers.
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.