Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Catherine Casamatta, A. Guembel (2010)
Managerial Legacies, Entrenchment and Strategic InertiaLabor: Personnel Economics
V. Laux (2008)
Board Independence and CEO Turnover: board independence and ceo turnoverJournal of Accounting Research, 46
Justin Johnson, David Myatt (2005)
On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product DesignIO: Theory
V. Laux (2014)
Corporate Governance, Board Oversight, and CEO TurnoverCorporate Finance: Governance
Bengt Holmstrom (1999)
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic PerspectiveThe Review of Economic Studies, 66
Gustavo Manso (2010)
Motivating InnovationMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (1998)
Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEOThe American Economic Review, 88
J. Crémer (1995)
Arm's Length RelationshipsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 110
Gillan (2016)
Incentives, termination payments, and CEO contractingJournal of Corporate Finance, 41
A. Bonatti, Johannes Hörner (2017)
Career Concerns with Exponential LearningTheoretical Economics, 12
E. Goldman, P. Huang (2015)
Contractual vs. Actual Separation Pay Following CEO TurnoverManag. Sci., 61
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (2001)
Management Entrenchment the Case of Manager-specific Investments*
Curtis Taylor, H. Yildirim (2011)
Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind EvaluationThe Review of Economic Studies, 78
A. Lizzeri, Margaret Meyer, N. Persico (2002)
The Incentive Effects of Interim Performance Evaluations
D. Yermack (2005)
Golden Handshakes: Separation Pay for Retired and Dismissed CEOSCorporate Law: Law & Finance eJournal
Hanming Fang, G. Moscarini (2003)
Morale HazardYale: Cowles Foundation Working Papers
T. Rusticus (2006)
Executive severance agreements
P. Huang (2011)
Marital Prenups? A Look at CEO Severance AgreementsERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)
Fang (2005)
Morale hazardJournal of Monetary Economics, 52
R. Inderst, Manuel Klein (2005)
Innovation, Endogenous Overinvestment, and Incentive Pay
π(1; α) = 0. Thus,ŝ = 1 is never optimal
Stuart Gillan, Nga Nguyen (2016)
Incentives, Termination Payments, and CEO ContractingCGN: Executive Compensation (Topic)
S. Kaplan, Bernadette Minton (2012)
How Has CEO Turnover Changed?CGN: CEOs (Sub-Topic)
Simon Anderson, Régis Renault (2003)
Efficiency and surplus bounds in Cournot competitionJ. Econ. Theory, 113
Andrés Almazán, J. Suárez (2003)
Entrenchment and Severance Pay in Optimal Governance StructuresJournal of Finance, 58
Casamatta (2010)
Managerial legacies, entrenchment, and strategic inertiaJournal of Finance, 65
Lucian Taylor (2008)
Why are CEOS Rarely Fired? Evidence from Structural EstimationCorporate Finance: Governance
R. Inderst, Holger Mueller (2010)
CEO Replacement under Private InformationReview of Financial Studies, 23
V. Laux (2006)
Board Independence and CEO TurnoverCorporate Finance: Governance
Vlad Mares, Jeroen Swinkels (2014)
On the analysis of asymmetric first price auctionsJ. Econ. Theory, 152
E. Weyl, M. Fabinger (2013)
Pass-Through as an Economic Tool: Principles of Incidence under Imperfect CompetitionJournal of Political Economy, 121
Mike Burkart, Denis Gromb, Fausto Panunzi (1997)
Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the FirmQuarterly Journal of Economics, 112
We consider a two‐period model in which the success of the firm depends on the effort of a first‐period manager (the incumbent) as well as the effort and ability of a second‐period manager. At the end of the first period, the board receives a noisy signal of the incumbent manager's ability and decides whether to retain or replace the incumbent manager. We show that severance pay can be utilized in the optimal contract to provide a credible commitment to a lenient second‐period equilibrium replacement policy, mitigating the first‐period moral hazard problem. Unlike existing models that aim to rationalize managerial entrenchment, we identify conditions on the information structure under which both entrenchment and anti‐entrenchment emerge in the optimal contract. Specifically, our model predicts that it is optimal for the board to design a contract to induce entrenchment (respectively, anti‐entrenchment) if the signal regarding the incumbent manager's ability becomes sufficiently uninformative (respectively, informative).
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.