Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joseph Farrell, John Hayes, C. Shapiro, Theresa Sullivan, Scott Peterson, J. Lerner, Gilad Ohana, Joseph Kattan, Dan Swanson (2007)
STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP
A. Layne-Farrar, J. Lerner (2006)
To Join or Not to Join: Examining Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing RulesIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
K. Blind, N. Thumm (2004)
Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implicationsResearch Policy, 33
Mark Lemley (2002)
Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting OrganizationsCalifornia Law Review, 90
U. Schmoch, F. Laville, P. Patel, Rainer Frietsch (2003)
Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research
Bernhard Ganglmair, Luke Froeb, G. Werden (2012)
Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation: Patent Hold-Up and AntitrustJournal of Industrial Economics, 60
George, Š., Cary, Mark, W., Nelson, Steven, J., Kaiser, Alex, R., Sistla (2011)
THE CASE FOR ANTITRUST LAW TO POLICE THE PATENT HOLDUP PROBLEM IN STANDARD SETTING
Rudi Bekkers, Arianna Martinelli, Federico Tamagni (2015)
The causal effect of including standards-related documentation into prior art: evidence from a recent EPO policy change
K. Hussinger, Franz Schwiebacher (2015)
The Market Value of Technology Disclosures to Standard Setting OrganizationsIndustry and Innovation, 22
Bernhard Ganglmair, E. Tarantino (2014)
Conversation with SecretsERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)
Justus Baron, Daniel Spulber (2018)
Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center DatabaseMacroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal
Byeongwoo Kang, Rudi Bekkers (2013)
Just-in-time inventions and the development of standards: How firms use opportunistic strategies to obtain standard-essential patents (SEPs)2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)
K. Kühn, Fiona Morton, Howard Shelanski (2013)
Standard Setting Organizations Can Help Solve the Standard Essential Patents Licensing ProblemAntitrust Chronicle, 3
B. Kang, Rudi Bekkers (2015)
Just-in-time patents and the development of standardsResearch Policy, 44
T. Simcoe (2007)
The standards edge: the golden mean
Alexander Galetovic, S. Haber, R. Levine (2015)
An Empirical Examination of Patent Hold-UpEmpirical Studies eJournal
Justus Baron, Juliane Schmidt (2014)
Technological Standardization, Endogenous Productivity and Transitory DynamicsPolitical Economy - Development: Domestic Development Strategies eJournal
Justus Baron, K. Gupta (2018)
Unpacking 3gpp StandardsMicroeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal
Justus Baron, K. Blind, T. Pohlmann (2011)
Essential patents and standard dynamics2011 7th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)
A. Layne-Farrar (2011)
Innovative or Indefensible?: An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard SettingInt. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res., 9
B. Kang, K. Motohashi (2015)
Essential intellectual property rights and inventors’ involvement in standardizationResearch Policy, 44
Gastón Llanes, S. Trento, Gastón Llanes, Antonio Cabrales, Antonio Ciccone, Marco Celentani, Andres Erosa, Belén Jerez, Gerard Llobet, Xavier Vives
Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Patent Policy, Patent Pools, and the Accumulation of Claims in Sequential Innovation Patent Policy, Patent Pools, and the Accumulation of Claims in Sequential Innovation
U. Schmoch, F. Laville, P. Patel, Rainer Frietsch (2003)
Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors
Timothy Simcoe (2005)
Explaining the Increase in Intellectual Property DisclosureERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)
Justus Baron, Henry Delcamp (2015)
The strategies of patent introduction into patent poolsEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 24
M. Dewatripont, P. Legros (2008)
‘Essential’ Patents, Frand Royalties and Technological StandardsIRPN: Competition Policy (Sub-Topic)
J. Tirole, J. Lerner (2002)
Efficient Patent PoolsIO: Productivity
Justus Baron, T. Pohlmann (2015)
The Eect of Patent Pools on Patenting and Innovation - Evidence from Contemporary Technology Standards
(2011)
An Empirical Study of the Effects of Ex Ante Disclosure Policies on the Development of Voluntary Technology Standards
G. Llanes, S. Trento (2012)
Patent policy, patent pools, and the accumulation of claims insequential innovation, 50
C. Shapiro (2001)
Innovation policy and the economy
T. Pohlmann, Peter Neuhäusler, K. Blind (2016)
Standard Essential Patents to Boost Financial ReturnsIO: Productivity
Rudi Bekkers, A. Updegrove (2012)
A Study of IPR Policies and Practices of a Representative Group of Standards Setting Organizations Worldwide
Gastón Llanes, Joaquin Poblete (2014)
Ex Ante Agreements in Standard Setting and Patent‐Pool FormationERN: Auctions
Mary Benner, J. Waldfogel (2007)
Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological ProximityERN: Technology (Topic)
(2014)
Comparison of Chinese and Korean companies in ICT global standardization: Essential patent analysis
K. Blind (2005)
Factors influencing the lifetime of telecommunication and information technology standards: results of an explorative analysis of the perinorm databaseThe 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.
J. Lerner, J. Tirole (2013)
Standard-Essential PatentsJournal of Political Economy, 123
(2005)
Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties
R. Bekkers, B. Kang (2015)
Just?in?time inventions and the development of standards, 44
A. Layne-Farrar, Gerard Llobet, Jorge Padilla (2011)
Payments and Participation: The Incentives to Join Cooperative Standard Setting EffortsERN: Other Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies (Topic)
Marc Rysman, Timothy Simcoe (2008)
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting OrganizationsManag. Sci., 54
(2000)
Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)
Justus Baron, Yann Ménière, T. Pohlmann (2014)
Standards, consortia, and innovationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 36
Rudi Bekkers, R. Bongard, A. Nuvolari (2011)
An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility StandardsIO: Regulation
Florian Berger, K. Blind, N. Thumm (2012)
Filing behaviour regarding essential patents in industry standardsResearch Policy, 41
Timothy Simcoe, Stuart Graham, M. Feldman (2009)
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform TechnologiesERPN: Other Firm (Sub-Topic)
Mark Lemley (2006)
Ten Things to do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To)Boston College Law Review, 48
C. Shapiro (2000)
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard SettingInnovation Policy and the Economy, 1
Mark Lemley, C. Shapiro (2006)
Patent Holdup and Royalty StackingStanford Law School
J. Sidak (2013)
The Meaning Of Frand, Part I: RoyaltiesJournal of Competition Law and Economics, 9
A. Layne-Farrar, Jorge Padilla, R. Schmalensee (2007)
Pricing Patents for Licensing in Standard Setting Organisations: Making Sense of FRAND CommitmentsEntrepreneurship
J. Tsai, Joshua Wright (2014)
Standard Setting, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Role of Antitrust in Regulating Incomplete ContractsERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)
Neil Gandal, Nataly Gantman, David Genesove (2004)
Intellectual Property and Standardization Committee Participation in the Us Modem IndustryCEPR Discussion Paper Series
Chryssoula Pentheroudakis, Justus Baron (2017)
Licensing Terms of Standard Essential Patents: A Comprehensive Analysis of CasesLaw & Society: Public Law - Antitrust eJournal
Rudi Bekkers, G. Duysters, B. Verspagen (2002)
Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSMInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management
Rna Bekkers, Christian Catalini, Arianna Martinelli, Timothy Simcoe (2012)
Intellectual property disclosure in standards development
Benjamin Chiao, J. Tirole, J. Lerner (2005)
The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical AnalysisEnvironment for Innovation eJournal
B. Ganglmair, L. M. Froeb, G. J. Werden (2012)
Patent hold?up and antitrust: How a well?intentioned rule could retard innovation, 60
This paper describes a new database of declared standard‐essential patents (SEPs), discusses methods for matching declared SEPs to specific standard documents, and presents empirical evidence on technology standards subject to declared SEPs. Although there is a growing body of empirical research using data on declared SEPs, this research has so far focused on the declared patents, and neglected the implications of SEP declarations for specific standards. Furthermore, we present a new methodology for matching standards with technology classes, using the classification of declared SEPs. This method allows identifying other standard‐related patents, and provides information on technological relationships between standards and standard‐related patenting. The paper discusses opportunities for new empirical research using databases of declared SEPs and data on patenting in standard‐related technology classes.
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.