Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1976)
Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago
M. Bourreau (2011)
Upstream Competition between Vertically Integrated FirmsERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)
S. Dasgupta, Z. Tao (2000)
Bargaining, Bonding, and Partial OwnershipInternational Economic Review, 41
M. Riordan (1991)
Ownership without control: Toward a theory of backward integrationJournal of The Japanese and International Economies, 5
H. Karle, T. Klein, K. Stahl (2011)
Ownership and Control in a Competitive IndustryMicroeconomics: Production
(1988)
Vertical separation.
Duarte Brito, Luís Cabral, Helder Vasconcelos (2014)
Divesting ownership in a rivalInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 34
J. Choi, Sang-Seung Yi (1997)
Vertical Foreclosure with the Choice of Input SpecificationsIndustrial Organization & Regulation eJournal
J. Ordover, Garth Saloner, S. Salop (2010)
Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure
Y. Spiegel (2013)
Backward Integration, Forward Integration, and Vertical ForeclosureO&M: The Firm as a Nexus of Contracts (Boundaries of the Firm) eJournal
Catherine Fontenay, J. Gans (2004)
Vertical Integration in the Presence of Upstream CompetitionAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
O. Hart, J. Tirole (1990)
Vertical integration and market foreclosure, 21
J. Sandonís, Ramon Faulí-Oller (2006)
On the competitive effects of vertical integration by a research laboratoryInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 24
W. Baumol, J. Ordover (1994)
On the perils of vertical control by a partial owner of a downstream enterprise, 69
R. Posner (1976)
Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective
Nadav Levy, Y. Spiegel, David Gilo (2018)
Partial Vertical Integration, Ownership Structure, and ForeclosureAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10
S. Salop, Daniel O'Brien (2000)
Competitive Effects of Partial Ownership: Financial Interest and Corporate ControlSocial Science Research Network
S. Caprice (2006)
Multilateral Vertical Contracting with an Alternative Supply: The Welfare Effects of a Ban on Price DiscriminationReview of Industrial Organization, 28
D. Flath (1991)
When is it rational for firms to acquire silent interests in rivalsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 9
P. Greenlee, A. Raskovich (2004)
Partial Vertical OwnershipIO: Firm Structure
David Gilo (2000)
The Anticompetitive Effect of Passive InvestmentAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
B. Bernheim, M. Whinston (1985)
Common marketing agency as a device for facilitating collusionThe RAND Journal of Economics, 16
Yongmin Chen, M. Riordan (2007)
Vertical integration, exclusive dealing, and ex post cartelizationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 38
Felix Höffler, Sebastian Kranz (2011)
Legal unbundling can be a golden mean between vertical integration and ownership separationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 29
Chaim Fershtman, K. Judd, E. Kalai (1991)
Observable Contracts: Strategic Delegation and CooperationInternational Economic Review, 32
Enghin Atalay, Ali Hortaçsu, C. Syverson (2014)
Vertical Integration and Input FlowsThe American Economic Review, 104
J. Gans, F. Wolak (2012)
A Comparison of Ex Ante versus Ex Post Vertical Market Power: Evidence from the Electricity Supply IndustryAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
Felix Höffler, Sebastian Kranz (2011)
Imperfect legal unbundling of monopolistic bottlenecksJournal of Regulatory Economics, 39
J. Allen, G. Phillips (1999)
Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances and Product Market RelationshipsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
L. Bowers (1980)
THE ANTITRUST PARADOX: A POLICY AT WAR WITH ITSELFAmerican Business Law Journal, 18
D. Flath (1989)
Vertical integration by means of shareholding interlocksInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 7
J. Tirole (1988)
The Theory of Industrial Organization
Yongmin Chen (2001)
On Vertical Mergers and Their Competitive EffectsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 32
W. Güth, N. Nikiforakis, Hans-Theo Normann (2006)
Vertical cross-shareholding: Theory and experimental evidenceInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 25
Marie-Laure Allain, Claire Chambolle, P. Rey (2010)
Vertical Integration, Innovation and Foreclosure
With backward acquisitions in their efficient supplier, downstream firms profitably internalize the effects of their actions on their rivals' sales, while upstream competition is also relaxed. Downstream prices increase with passive, yet decrease with controlling acquisition. Passive acquisition is profitable when controlling acquisition is not. Downstream acquirers strategically abstain from vertical control, thus delegating commitment to the supplier, and with it high input prices, allowing them to charge high downstream prices. The effects of passive backward acquisition are reinforced with the acquisition by several downstream firms in the efficient supplier. The results are sustained when suppliers charge two‐part tariffs.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.