Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1610)
Child Protection and Child Outcomes: Measuring the Effects of Forster Care
T. Dunne, Mark Roberts, L. Samuelson (1989)
The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing PlantsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 104
D. Corderi, C.-Y. Lin (2011)
Measuring the social rate of return to R&D in coal, petroleum and nuclear manufacturing: A study of the OECD countriesEnergy Policy, 39
Wesley Cohen (2010)
Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance, 1
Alberto Galasso, Mark Schankerman (2013)
Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the CourtsERPN: Patents (Sub-Topic)
A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction
J. Lanjouw, Mark Schankerman (2004)
Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?*The Journal of Law and Economics, 47
J.H. Stock, M. Yogo (2005)
Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
N. Bloom, Mark Schankerman, J. Reenen (2005)
Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market RivalryEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
C. Jones, J. Williams (1998)
Measuring the Social Rate of Return to R&D, 113
The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools
Eric Budish, Benjamin Roin, Heidi Williams (2013)
Do Firms Underinvest in Long-Term Research? Evidence from Cancer Clinical TrialsBiology & Law eJournal
Heidi Williams (2013)
Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human GenomeJournal of Political Economy, 121
I. Segal, M. Whinston (2003)
Robust Predictions for Bilateral Contracting with ExternalitiesEconometrica, 71
Heidi Williams (2017)
How Do Patents Affect Research Investments?S&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
(2012)
Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series The Case Against Patents
Bronwyn Hall, J. Lerner (2009)
The Financing of R&D and InnovationEntrepreneurship & Finance eJournal
Jaeyong Song, P. Almeida, Geraldine Wu (2003)
Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer?Manag. Sci., 49
D. Rivers, Q. Vuong (1988)
Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit ModelsJournal of Econometrics, 39
J. Kling (2006)
Incarceration Length, Employment, and EarningsLaw & Economics eJournal
Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis
Alberto Galasso (2012)
Broad Cross‐License NegotiationsO&M: Decision-Making in Organizations eJournal
Aditi Mehta, Marc Rysman, Timothy Simcoe (2010)
Identifying the age profile of patent citations: new estimates of knowledge diffusionJournal of Applied Econometrics, 25
J. Gans, David Hsu, Scott Stern (2000)
When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?Sources of Innovation eJournal
J. Baten, Nicola Bianchi, Petra Moser (2015)
Does Compulsory Licensing Discourage Invention? Evidence from German Patents after WwiNBER Working Paper Series
Jeffrey Woodbridge (2002)
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
K. Binmore, A. Rubinstein, A. Wolinsky (1985)
The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling
C. Jones, John Williams (1997)
Measuring the Social Return to R&DMacroeconomics eJournal
Daniel Spulber (2013)
How Do Competitive Pressures Affect Incentives to Innovate When There Is a Market for Inventions?Journal of Political Economy, 121
B. Cassiman, Masako Ueda (2002)
Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-UpsCorporate Finance: Valuation
(2005)
Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression,
Guan-Cheng Li, Ronald Lai, A. D'Amour, David Doolin, Ye Sun, Vetle Torvik, A. Yu, L. Fleming (2014)
Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010)Research Policy, 43
Joan Farre-Mensa, D. Hegde, Alexander Ljungqvist (2016)
The Bright Side of PatentsSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Mark Schankerman (1998)
How Valuable is Patent Protection?: Estimates by Technology FieldThe RAND Journal of Economics, 29
K. Arrow (1962)
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
B. Hall, J. Lerner, N. Rosenberg (2010)
Handbook of the Economics of Innovation
M. Boldrin, D.K. Levine (2013)
The Case Against Patents, 27
R&D and the Patent Premium
P. Aghion, N. Bloom, Richard Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt (2004)
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U RelationshipEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
James Thompson (1967)
Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory
Rosemarie Ziedonis (2003)
Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of FirmsIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
D. Burk (2016)
On the Sociology of PatentingSociology of Innovation eJournal
Mark Lemley (2015)
Faith-Based Intellectual Property
P. Aghion, P. Howitt, Susanne Prantl (2013)
Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovationJournal of Economic Growth, 20
K. Arrow (1962)
The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors
A. Conti, Jerry Thursby, Marie Thursby (2013)
Patents as Signals for Startup FinancingERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)
J. Gans, Scott Stern (2002)
The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology EntrepreneursIO: Productivity
G. Loury (1979)
Market Structure and InnovationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 93
(2008)
Social and economic networks (Princeton
The, Quarterly of, May 1998 (2009)
Recombinant Growth
M Jackson (2008)
Social and Economic Networks
Alberto Galasso, Mark Schankerman (2010)
Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 41
Mark Schankerman, A. Pakes (1985)
Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 PeriodNBER Working Paper Series
We study the causal impact of patent invalidation on subsequent innovation and exit by patent holders. The analysis uses patent litigation data from the US Federal Circuit Court and exploits random allocation of judges to control for endogeneity of the decision. Invalidation causes patent holders to reduce patenting over a five‐year window by 50% on average, but the effect is heterogeneous. The impact is large for small‐ and medium‐sized firms, particularly where they face many large competitors, and for patents central to their research portfolio. We find no significant effect for large firms. Invalidation also increases exit from patenting by small firms.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.