Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Bebchuk, J. Fried, D. Walker (2002)
Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive CompensationCorporate Governance: Compensation of Executive & Directors eJournal
Kevin Murphy, Ján Zábojník (2007)
Managerial Capital and the Market for CEOsOrganizations & Markets eJournal
G. Garvey, Todd Milbourn (2003)
Incentive Compensation when Executives can Hedge the Market: Evidence of Relative Performance Evaluation in the Cross SectionJournal of Finance, 58
Alex Edmans, X. Gabaix (2010)
The Effect of Risk on the CEO MarketCorporate Governance - Theory
Michael Raith (2004)
Specific Knowledge and Performance MeasurementERN: Governance & Ownership (Topic)
Klaus Schmidt (1997)
Managerial Incentives and Product Market CompetitionThe Review of Economic Studies, 64
Bengt Holmstrom (1979)
Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 10
S. Kaplan, Bernadette Minton (2006)
How Has CEO Turnover Changed? Increasingly Performance Sensitive Boards and Increasingly Uneasy CEOSCorporate Finance: Governance
Yermack Yermack (2006)
Golden Handshakes: Separation Pay for Retired and Dismissed CEOsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 41
Marco Celentani, Rosa Loveira (2006)
A simple explanation of the relative performance evaluation puzzleReview of Economic Dynamics, 9
James Bannister, Harry Newman (2003)
Analysis of Corporate Disclosures on Relative Performance EvaluationAccounting Horizons, 17
Marko Terviö (2007)
Difference that CEOs Make: An Assignment Model ApproachSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Journal of Finance, 59
Dittmann Dittmann, Maug Maug, Spalt Spalt (2010)
Sticks or Carrots? Optimal CEO Compensation When Managers Are Loss?AverseJournal of Finance, 65
J. Vickers, G. Yarrow (1988)
Privatization: An Economic Analysis
Pierre Chaigneau, Nicolas Sahuguet (2012)
The structure of CEO pay: pay-for-luck and stock-options
S. Joh (1999)
Strategic Managerial Incentive Compensation in Japan: Relative Performance Evaluation and Product Market CollusionReview of Economics and Statistics, 81
Alex Edmans, X. Gabaix, Augustin Landier (2008)
The Rodney L . White Center for Financial Research A Multiplicative Model of Optimal CEO Incentives in Market Equilibrium
Paul Oyer (2000)
Why Do Firms Use Incentives that Have No Incentive Effects?Journal of Financial Abstracts eJournal
G. Garvey, Todd Milbourn (2006)
Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for badJournal of Financial Economics, 82
S. Rosen (1990)
Contracts and the Market for ExecutivesNBER Working Paper Series
Dittmann Dittmann, Maug Maug (2007)
Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive PayJournal of Finance, 62
Marianne Bertrand, S. Mullainathan (2001)
Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Principals AreQuarterly Journal of Economics, 116
Vicente Fumás (1992)
Relative performance evaluation of management : The effects on industrial competition and risk sharingInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 10
R. Gopalan, Todd Milbourn, Fenghua Song (2009)
Strategic Flexibility and the Optimality of Pay for Sector PerformanceERN: CEO & Executive Motivation & Incentives (Topic)
Rajesh Aggarwal, Andrew Samwick (1996)
Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and EvidenceSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
J. Sobel (1997)
A Re-Examination of Yardstick CompetitionIndustrial Organization & Regulation eJournal
Terviö Terviö (2008)
The Difference that CEOs Make: An Assignment Model ApproachAmerican Economic Review, 98
Ingolf Dittmann, Oliver Spalt (2013)
Internet Appendix for: "Sticks or Carrots? Optimal CEO Compensation when Managers are Loss Averse"
Bebchuk (2003)
Executive Compensation as an Agency ProblemJournal of Economic Perspectives, 17
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123
D. Yermack (2005)
Golden Handshakes: Separation Pay for Retired and Dismissed CEOSCorporate Law: Law & Finance eJournal
Aggarwal (1999)
Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Finance, 54
Salas Fumás Salas Fumás (1992)
Relative Performance Evaluation of ManagementInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 10
C. Himmelberg, R. Hubbard (2000)
Incentive Pay and the Market for CEOS: An Analysis of Pay-for-Performance SensitivityLabor: Personnel Economics eJournal
Ingolf Dittmann, Ernst Maug (2007)
Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive PayEuropean Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Finance Working Paper Series
(1983)
An Analysis of the Principal
L. Bebchuk, J. Fried (2003)
Executive Compensation as an Agency ProblemCorporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law eJournal
Jorge Aseff, Manuel Santos (2001)
Stock options and managerial optimal contractsEconomic Theory, 26
J. Laffont, D. Martimort (2001)
The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model
Canice Prendergast (1999)
The Provision of Incentives in FirmsJournal of Economic Literature, 37
Gopalan Gopalan, Milbourn Milbourn, Song Song (2010)
Strategic Flexibility and the Optimality of Pay for Sector PerformanceReview of Financial Studies, 23
Andrei Shleifer (1985)
A Theory of Yardstick CompetitionThe RAND Journal of Economics, 16
G. Crystal (1991)
In Search of Excess: The Overcompensation of American Executives
Gabaix Gabaix, Landier Landier (2009)
A Multiplicative Model of Optimal CEO Incentives in Market EquilibriumReview of Financial Studies, 22
Raith Raith (2008)
Specific Knowledge and Performance MeasurementRAND Journal of Economics, 39
X. Gabaix, Augustin Landier (2006)
Why Has CEO Pay Increased so Much?Organizations & Markets eJournal
Pierre Chaigneau, Nicolas Sahuguet (2012)
Pay-for-Luck in CEO Compensation: Matching and Efficient Contracting
Bengt Holmstrom (1982)
Moral Hazard in TeamsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 13
This article examines why CEOs are rewarded for luck, namely for observable shocks beyond their control. I propose a simple hidden action model where the agent has implicit incentives to avoid bankruptcy. After signing the contract, but before acting, the agent observes a signal on future luck. Implicit incentives are weaker after good news, and call for higher pay‐for‐performance sensitivity in good times. As a result, managerial pay is tied to luck. The model is also consistent with recent evidence of asymmetric pay for luck, that is, a larger exposure of managerial pay to good luck than to bad.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.