Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Nirvikar Singh, X. Vives (1984)
Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopolyThe RAND Journal of Economics, 15
Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright (2015)
Price Coherence and Excessive IntermediationProgram On Negotiation (PON) at Harvard Law School Working Paper Series
D. Condorelli, A. Galeotti, Vasiliki Skreta (2013)
Selling Through ReferralsERN: Other Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies (Topic)
H. Karle, M. Peitz, Markus Reisinger (2017)
Segmentation versus Agglomeration: Competition between Platforms with Competitive SellersJournal of Political Economy, 128
J. Harrington (1995)
Experimentation and Learning in a Differentiated-Products DuopolyJournal of Economic Theory, 66
Esther Gal‐Or, Ronen Gal-Or, Nabita Penmetsa (2018)
Can Platform Competition Support Market Segmentation? Network Externalities Versus Matching Efficiency in Equity Crowdfunding MarketsERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Personnel Management (Topic)
A. Mantovani, C. Piga, Carlo Reggiani (2020)
Online Platform Price Parity Clauses: Evidence from the EU Booking.com caseEconomics of Networks eJournal
Justin Johnson (2017)
The Agency Model and MFN ClausesIO: Theory eJournal
J. Crémer, M. Riordan (1987)
On Governing Multilateral Transactions with Bilateral ContractsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 18
Chengsi Wang, Julian Wright (2020)
Search platforms: showrooming and price parity clausesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 51
M. Hunold, R. Kesler, U. Laitenberger, Frank Schlütter (2018)
Evaluation of best price clauses in online hotel bookingsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization
Arthur Cazaubiel, Morgane Cure, B. Johansen, T. Vergé (2020)
Substitution between online distribution channels: Evidence from the Oslo hotel marketInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 69
Francisca Wals, M. Schinkel (2018)
Platform monopolization by narrow-PPC-BPG combination: Booking et al.International Journal of Industrial Organization
L. Lambertini, A. Mantovani (2009)
Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approachInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 27
J. Baker, Fiona Morton (2017)
Antitrust Enforcement Against Platform MFNsERN: Antitrust (IO) (Topic)
M. Armstrong (2005)
Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤Industrial Organization
H. Varian (1980)
A Model of SalesThe American Economic Review, 70
Esther Gal‐Or (2020)
Market segmentation on dating platformsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 68
A. Cazaubiel, M. Cure, B. O. Johansen, T. Vergé (2017)
Develop a model where there are, 2020. Substitution between online distribution channels: Evidence from the Oslo hotel market, 69
David Ronayne, Greg Taylor (2021)
Competing Sales Channels with Captive ConsumersThe Economic Journal
Carlotta Mariotto, Marianne Verdier (2020)
Platform–Merchant Competition for Sales ServicesIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal
H. Horn, A. Wolinsky (1988)
BILATERAL MONOPOLIES AND INCENTIVES FOR MERGERThe RAND Journal of Economics, 19
M. Armstrong, Julian Wright (2004)
Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive ContractsEconomic Theory, 32
A. Mantovani, C. Piga, Carlo Reggiani (2018)
On the Economic Effects of Price Parity Clauses - What Do We Know Three Years Later?Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9
K. Bryan, J. Gans (2018)
A Theory of Multihoming in Rideshare CompetitionMicroeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth
A. Boik, Kenneth Corts (2016)
The Effects of Platform Most-Favored-Nation Clauses on Competition and EntryThe Journal of Law and Economics, 59
B. Caillaud, B. Jullien (2003)
Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service ProvidersThe RAND Journal of Economics, 34
R. Cellini, L. Lambertini (2002)
A differential game approach to investment in product differentiation, 27
J. Rochet, J. Tirole (2006)
Two-sided markets: a progress reportThe RAND Journal of Economics, 37
J. Rochet, Jean Triole (2003)
Platform competition in two sided marketsLSE Research Online Documents on Economics
Price parity clauses (PPCs) are widely adopted by online platforms to force client sellers not to lower their prices elsewhere. We investigate under what conditions online travel agencies (OTAs) decide to apply PPCs, and how this affects hotels' listing decisions on OTAs. We find OTAs adopt PPCs when there is a sufficiently large competitive pressure in the market, either between OTAs, or between hotels (or both). PPCs allow OTAs to charge higher commission fees to hotels, which can respond by delisting from certain OTAs, thereby segmenting the market. We also find that consumers and hotels generally lose out with PPCs.
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.