Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Bresnahan, S. Greenstein (1996)
Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Use of Computers, 1996
D. Fudenberg, J. Tirole (1998)
Trade-Ins, Upgrades, and Buy-BacksThe RAND Journal of Economics, 29
M. Whinston (1989)
Tying, Foreclosure, and ExclusionNBER Working Paper Series
Michael Mussa, S. Rosen (1978)
Monopoly and product qualityJournal of Economic Theory, 18
J. Eisenach, Thomas Lenard (1999)
Competition, innovation, and the Microsoft monopoly : antitrust in the digital marketplace : proceedings of a conference held by the Progress & Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC, February 5, 1998
Carlton Carlton, Waldman Waldman (2002)
The Strategic Use of Trying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving IndustriesRAND Journal of Economics, 33
Joseph Farrell, M. Katz (2000)
Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets
D. Fudenberg, J. Tirole (1998)
Upgrades, Tradeins, and BuybacksThe RAND Journal of Economics, 29
(2008)
Forthcoming in American Economic Review
J. Choi (1996)
Preemptive R&D, Rent Dissipation, and the “Leverage Theory”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111
T. Bresnahan (1998)
New Modes of Competition: Implications for the Future Structure of the Computer Industry
Whinston Whinston (1990)
Tying, Foreclosure, and ExclusionAmerican Economic Review, 80
(2002)
Patent Pools: 100 Years of Law and Economics Solitude,
Lerner Lerner, Tirole Tirole (2004)
Efficient Patent PoolsAmerican Economic Review, 94
C. Shapiro (2000)
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard SettingInnovation Policy and the Economy, 1
(2000)
Did Microsoft Harm Consumers? Two Opposing Views
J. Tirole, J. Lerner (2002)
Efficient Patent PoolsIO: Productivity
D. Carlton, Michael Waldman (1998)
The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving IndustriesIndustrial Organization & Regulation eJournal
(2002)
Product Improvement and Technological Tying”, mimeo, Columbia University and University of California, Berkeley
B. Nalebuff (2004)
Bundling as an Entry BarrierQuarterly Journal of Economics, 119
T. Bresnahan, S. Greenstein (2003)
Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 47
T. Bresnahan (1999)
New Modes of Competition
J. Gabszewicz, Xavier Wauthy (2003)
The option of joint purchase in vertically differentiated marketsEconomic Theory, 22
Glenn Ellison (2003)
A Model of Add-On PricingIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
J. Choi, C. Stefanadis (2000)
Tying, Investment, and the Dynamic Leverage TheoryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 32
We develop a model in which a main product (called product A) provides a performance quality z by itself, whereas a complementary product (called product B) is useless by itself but enhances the main product's performance quality to q > z. This asymmetric complementarity gives rise to the following results. First, if z is relatively small, then firms A and B behave as if the products are symmetrically complementary with the usual double marginalization problem. Second, if z is sufficiently large, then firms A and B price their products as if they are independent. Third, over a certain range of intermediate z, no pure‐strategy Nash equilibrium exists.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.