Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Axtell (2001)
Zipf Distribution of US Firm SizesScience, 293
Baily (1992)
Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing PlantsBrookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics
Dunne Dunne, Roberts Roberts, Samuelson Samuelson (1989)
The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing PlantsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 104
Bernard (2010)
Multi-product Firms and Product SwitchingAmerican Economic Review
Caves (1982a)
The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and ProductivityEconometrica, 50
Caves (1982b)
Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input and Productivity using Superlative Index NumbersEconomic Journal, 92
Trefler Trefler (2004)
The Long and Short of the Canada–U.S. Free Trade AgreementAmerican Economic Review, 94
Bloom Bloom (2008)
The Impact of Uncertainty ShocksEconometrica, 77
Foster Foster, Haltiwanger Haltiwanger, Syverson Syverson (2008)
Reallocation, Firm Turnover and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or ProfitabilityAmerican Economic Review, 98
Griffith Griffith, Harrison Harrison, Van Reenen Van Reenen (2006)
How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of US R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology SourcingAmerican Economic Review, 96
Broda (2006)
Globalization and the Gains from VarietyQuarterly Journal of Economics, 121
Bloom N. (2008)
623Econometrica, 77
Pavcnik Pavcnik (2002)
Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvement: Evidence from Chilean PlantsReview of Economic Studies, 69
Jovanovic Jovanovic (1982)
Selection and the Evolution of IndustryEconometrica, 50
Roeger Roeger (1995)
Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for US ManufacturingJournal of Political Economy, 103
Aghion (2005)
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U RelationshipQuarterly Journal of Economics, 120
Melitz Melitz (2003)
The Impact of Trade on Intra‐industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry ProductivityEconometrica, 71
Rosen Rosen (1982)
Authority, Control and the Distribution of EarningsBell Journal of Economics, 13
Lucas Lucas (1978)
On the Size Distribution of Business FirmsBell Journal of Economics, 9
Banerjee (2004)
How Efficiently is Capital Allocated? Evidence from the Knitted Garment Industry in TirupurReview of Economic Studies, 71
Levinsohn Levinsohn, Petrin Petrin (2003)
Estimating Production Functions using Inputs to Control for UnobservablesReview of Economic Studies, 70
Rossi‐Hansberg Rossi‐Hansberg, Wright Wright (2007)
Establishment Size Dynamics in the Aggregate EconomyAmerican Economic Review, 97
Olley Olley, Pakes Pakes (1996)
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment IndustryEconometrica, 64
Bernard (2007)
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous FirmsReview of Economic Studies, 73
Helpman Helpman, Melitz Melitz, Yeaple Yeaple (2004)
Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous FirmsAmerican Economic Review, 94
Bernard (2003)
Plants and Productivity in International TradeAmerican Economic Review, 93
Klette Klette, Griliches Griliches (1996)
The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and EndogenousJournal of Applied Econometrics, 11
Van Biesebroeck Van Biesebroeck (2005)
Exporting Raises Productivity in Sub‐Saharan African Manufacturing FirmsJournal of International Economics, 67
Hopenhayn Hopenhayn (1992)
Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run EquilibriumEconometrica, 60
Marschak Marschak, Andrews Andrews (1944)
Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of ProductionEconometrica, 56
Ghironi Ghironi, Melitz Melitz (2005)
International Trade and Macroeconomic Dynamics with Heterogeneous FirmsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 120
Hall Hall (1988)
The Relationship between Price and Marginal Cost in US IndustryJournal of Political Economy, 96
Ericsson Ericsson, Pakes Pakes (1995)
Markov‐perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical WorkReview of Economic Studies, 62
When firms make decisions about which product to manufacture at a more disaggregated level than observed in the data, measured firm productivity reflects both characteristics of the firm and attributes of the products that are non‐randomly chosen by the firm. This paper develops a model of industry equilibrium in which firms endogenously sort across products and characterizes the resulting bias in measured firm and aggregate productivity. Calibrating the model's parameters, we show that endogenous product selection can have quantitatively important effects on measured firm and aggregate productivity and their response to changes in parameter values.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.