Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/radiation-protection-issues-related-to-the-use-of-nuclear-power-BdSFtCUWU5
References (116)
-
Martin Peterson (2002)
What Is a de Minimis Risk?Risk Management, 4
-
Icrp (1977)
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26Annals of The Icrp, 1
-
(1991)
Principles for Intervention for Protection of the Public in a Radiological Emergency. A report of a Task Group of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.Annals of the ICRP, 22 4
-
S. Hansson (2007)
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS IN COST–BENEFIT ANALYSISEconomics and Philosophy, 23
-
S. Hansson (2009)
Should we protect the most sensitive people?Journal of Radiological Protection, 29
-
K. Shrader-Frechette, L. Persson (1997)
Ethical issues in radiation protection.Health physics, 73 2
-
(2002)
The Human Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident A Strategy for Recovery A Report Commissioned by UNDP and UNICEF with the support of UN-OCHA and WHO -
Application of the Commission?s Recommendations for the Protection of People in Emergency Exposure Situations. ICRP Publication 109
Ann ICRP, 39
-
S. Rappaport (1993)
Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States.American journal of industrial medicine, 23 5
-
(2002)
considerations in protection of the environment from the effects of ionizing radiation -
Chris Whipple (1988)
De minimis risk -
A. González, G. Mason, R. Clarke, A. Wrixon, J. Cooper, L. Holm, J. Boice, C. Cousins, R. Cox, J. Valentin, J. Lee, H. Menzel, Z. Pan, R. Pentreath, R. Preston, Y. Sasaki, N. Shandala, C. Streffer, A. Sugier (2007)
Scope of radiological protection control measures.Annals of the ICRP, 37 5
-
Principles for intervention for protection of the public in a radiological emergency. ICRP Publication 63
Ann ICRP, 22
-
F. Romerio (2002)
Which Paradigm for Managing the Risk of Ionizing Radiation?Risk Analysis, 22
-
(1987)
a Value to Trans-boundary Radiation Exposure -
(1963)
The International Commission on Radiological ProtectionNature, 197
-
Division Earth (2006)
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 -
G. Silini (1992)
Ethical issues in radiation protection--the 1992 Sievert Lecture.Health physics, 63 2
-
A. González (2004)
Radiation safety standards and their application: international policies and current issues.Health physics, 87 3
-
(2001)
Equity and Credibility: Ethical Dilemmas Relating to Nuclear Waste -
S. Hansson (2005)
Seven Myths of RiskRisk Management, 7
-
B. Yatsalo, T. Sullivan, V. Didenko, I. Linkov (2011)
Environmental risk management for radiological accidents: Integrating risk assessment and decision analysis for remediation at different spatial scalesIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7
-
(1959)
International Recommendations on Radiological Protection: Revised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection at the Sixth International Congress of Radiology, London, July 1950Annals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication, OS_1
-
Icrp (1991)
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60Annals of The Icrp, 21
-
D. Oughton (2011)
Social and ethical issues in environmental risk managementIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7
-
S. Weisenburger (1979)
Radioactive waste managementNature, 277
-
Philosophy Teknikringen (2004)
The Precautionary Principle and the Concept of Precaution -
R. Pentreath (2004)
Ethics, genetics and dynamics: an emerging systematic approach to radiation protection of the environment.Journal of environmental radioactivity, 74 1-3
-
(2000)
Ethical Issues in Radiation Protection-An International Workshop -
R. Clarke, J. Valentin (2009)
ICRP publication 109. Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations.Annals of the ICRP, 39 1
-
(1990)
Optimization and decision - making in radiological protection . ICRP Publication 55 -
(2009)
Application of the Commission ’ s Recommendations to the Protection of People Living in Long - term Contaminated Areas After a Nuclear Accident or a Radiation Emergency . ICRP Publication 111 -
Birgitte Wandall (2004)
Values in science and risk assessment.Toxicology letters, 152 3
-
Roger Clarke (1999)
Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change?Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 19 2
-
S. Hansson (2011)
Radiation Protection—Sorting Out the ArgumentsPhilosophy & Technology, 24
-
(1993)
from Potential Exposure—a conceptual framework -
R. Clarke, L. Holm (2003)
The Commission's policy on the environment.Annals of the ICRP, 33 3
-
D. Brenner, R. Doll, D. Goodhead, E. Hall, C. Land, J. Little, J. Lubin, D. Preston, R. Preston, J. Puskin, E. Ron, R. Sachs, J. Samet, R. Setlow, M. Zaider (2003)
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really knowProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100
-
Gonzalez Gonzalez (2002)
The debate on the health effects attributable to low radiation exposurePierce Law Review, 1
-
R. Carter (2003)
PrinciplesCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 36
-
C. Clement (2009)
Environmental protection : the concept and use of reference animals and plants -
(1987)
Assigning a Value to Trans-boundary Radiation Exposure -
R. Clarke, J. Valentin (2009)
The History of ICRP and the Evolution of its PoliciesAnnals of the ICRP, 39
-
S. Hansson (1998)
Setting the Limit: Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science -
(1993)
Protection from potential exposure: a conceptual framework. A report of a task group of committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.Annals of the ICRP, 23 1
-
D. Sowby, J. Valentin (2003)
Forty years on: how radiological protection has evolved internationally.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 23 2
-
G. Bennett (1997)
The principles of radioactive waste managementJournal of Hazardous Materials, 54
-
A. Fleming, K. Joyner (1992)
Estimates of absorption of radiofrequency radiation by the embryo and fetus during pregnancy.Health physics, 63 2
-
P. Sandin (2005)
Naturalness and de minimis RiskEnvironmental Ethics, 27
-
(1989)
Optimization and decision-making in radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.Annals of the ICRP, 20 1
-
B. Lindell (1996)
The Risk Philosophy of Radiation ProtectionRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 68
-
Axel Gosseries (2007)
Radiological Protection and Intergenerational Justice -
(2002)
The debate on the health effects attributable to low radiation exposure. Pierce Law Review -
(1998)
protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste -
E. Gilbert (1992)
The assessment of risks from exposure to low-levels of ionizing radiation -
C. Clement (2009)
Application of the commission's recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations -
J. Valentin (2003)
A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non-human speciesAnnals of the ICRP, 33
-
A. Upton (1991)
Risk estimates for carcinogenic effects of radiationAnnals of the ICRP, 22
-
J. Lochard (2007)
REHABILITATION OF LIVING CONDITIONS IN TERRITORIES CONTAMINATED BY THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT: THE ETHOS PROJECTHealth Physics, 93
-
K. Shrader-Frechette (2004)
Using A Thought Experiment To Clarify A Radiobiological ControversySynthese, 128
-
(1997)
Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management -
Cambridge Cb (1965)
The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic RadiationNature, 206
-
(2007)
The ethical foundation of radiation protection–from utilitarianism to an “individual-based philosophy. -
F. Bréchignac, C. Bradshaw, S. Carroll, A. Jaworska, L. Kapustka, L. Monte, D. Oughton (2011)
Recommendations from the international union of radioecology to improve guidance on radiation protectionIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7
-
E. Silbergeld (1994)
Risk Assessment and Risk Management: An Uneasy Divorce -
(1995)
exposure in nuclear safety -
N. Ban, H. Ishiguro (1990)
A Brief Introduction of ICRP Publication 55: Optimization and Decision-Making in Radiological ProtectionJapanese Journal of Health Physics, 25
-
S. Suga (1994)
A Brief Introduction of ICRP Publication 63: “Principles for Intervention for Protection of the Public in a Radiological Emergency”Japanese Journal of Health Physics, 29
-
Environmental Protection ? the Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants. ICRP Publication 108
Ann ICRP, 38
-
K. Shrader-Frechette (1993)
Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case Against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste -
B. Lindell (1989)
Comments on various views on the concept of 'de minimis'.Health physics, 57 1
-
S. Hansson (2007)
Ethics and radiation protectionJournal of Radiological Protection, 27
-
A. González (2002)
The Debate on the Health Effects Attributable to LowRadiation ExposureUniversity of New Hampshire Law Review, 1
-
R. Clarke (2003)
The evolution of the system of radiological protection: the justification for new ICRP recommendations.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 23 2
-
P. Wikman-Svahn, Martin Peterson, S. Hansson (2006)
Principles of protection: a formal approach for evaluating dose distributionsJournal of Radiological Protection, 26
-
H. Hermansson (2005)
Consistent risk management: Three models outlinedJournal of Risk Research, 8
-
S. Roach, S. Rappaport (1990)
But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.American journal of industrial medicine, 17 6
-
J. Lochard, I. Bogdevitch, E. Gallego, P. Hedemann-Jensen, A. Mcewan, A. Nisbet, A. Oudiz, T. Oudiz, P. Strand, A. Janssens, T. Lazo, Z. Carr, A. Sugier, P. Burns, P. Carboneras, D. Cool, J. Cooper, M. Kai, J. Lecomte, H. Liu, G. Massera, A. McGarry, K. Mrabit, M. Mrabit, K. Sjöblom, A. Tsela, W. Weiss (2009)
Annex A. Historical experience of long-term contaminated areasAnnals of the ICRP, 39
-
S. Hansson (2004)
Weighing risks and benefitsTopoi-an International Review of Philosophy, 23
-
M. Balonov, B. Boecker, A. Bouville, G. Dietze, K. Eckerman, J. Inaba, I. Liktharev, J. Lipsztein, H. Menzel, H. Métivier, H. Paretzke, A. Pradhan, J. Stather, V. Berkovski, W. Bolch, J. Harrison (2008)
Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. ICRP Publication 106. Approved by the Commission in October 2007.Annals of the ICRP, 38 1-2
-
A. Persson (2008)
Occupational and non-occupational health risks: can double standards be justified?International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 10
-
(1991)
Acceptable evidence: science and values in risk assessment -
T. Perko (2011)
Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accidentIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7
-
L. Persson, K. Shrader-Frechette (2001)
An evaluation of the ethical principles of the ICRP's radiation protection standards for workers.Health physics, 80 3
-
(2001)
Responsibility, Equity and Credibility: Ethical Dilemmas Relating to Nuclear Waste -
B. Lambert (2000)
On collective doseJournal of Radiological Protection, 20
-
(2000)
Ethical Values in the context of ICRP recommendations -
W. Moss, G. Tietjen (1989)
Reassessment of Human and Beagle Dog Pu Excretion Data Based on Reevaluation of Human Pu Excretion DataHealth Physics, 57
-
(1993)
Optimising radiation protection—the ethical and legal bases -
(2007)
2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection -
H. Adler, A. Weinberg (1978)
An approach to setting radiation standards.Health physics, 34 6
-
J. Valentin (1998)
Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: (Addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53) ICRP Publication 80 Approved by the Commission in September 1997Annals of the ICRP, 28
-
B. Drottz-Sjöberg, L. Persson (1993)
Public reaction to radiation: fear, anxiety, or phobia?Health physics, 64 3
-
Jeryang Park, T. Seager, P. Rao (2011)
Lessons in risk‐ versus resilience‐based design and managementIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7
-
C. Clement, T. Iimoto, G. Kwong, C. McKenney, P. Metcalf, J-P. Minon, A. Orrell, T. Pather, B. Taebi (2022)
of the ICRP -
K. Shrader-Frechette (1985)
Technological risk and small probabilitiesJournal of Business Ethics, 4
-
A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non?human species. ICRP Publication 91
Ann ICRP, 33
-
C. Meinhold (2004)
Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: The evolution of radiation protection--from erythema to genetic risks to risks of cancer to...?Health physics, 87 3
-
K. Shrader-Frechette, L. Persson (2002)
Ethical, logical and scientific problems with the new ICRP proposals.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 22 2
-
Meinhold Meinhold, Lauriston Lauriston (2004)
Taylor Lectur: The evolution of radiation protection?from erythema to genetic risks to risks of cancer to ?Health Phys, 87
-
R. Pentreath (2005)
Concept and use of Reference Animals and Plants -
Brenner Brenner, Doll Doll, Goodhead Goodhead, Hall Hall, Land Land, Little Little, Lubin Lubin, Preston Preston, Preston Preston, Puskin Puskin (2003)
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really knowPro Natl Acad Sci USA, 100
-
Heather Douglas (2000)
Inductive Risk and Values in SciencePhilosophy of Science, 67
-
Niklas Möller, P. Wikman-Svahn (2011)
Black Elephants and Black Swans of Nuclear SafetyEthics, Policy & Environment, 14
-
(2000)
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes -
I. Fairlie, D. Sumner (2000)
In defence of collective dose.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 20 1
-
(2003)
Potential Exposure in Nuclear Safety INSAG-9 -
Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 1
Ann ICRP, 1
-
J. Lochard, C. Schieber (2000)
The evolution of radiological risk management: an overview.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 20 2
-
G. Bennett (1996)
International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation of and for the safety of radiation sourcesJournal of Hazardous Materials, 45
-
Per Wikman (2004)
Trivial risks and the new radiation protection system.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 24 1
-
(2006)
Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts -
J. Valentin (1998)
Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste: ICRP Publication 81Annals of the ICRP, 28
-
Vincent Baumont (2006)
Stakeholders and Radiological Protection : Lessons from Chernobyl 20 Years After A Report by the Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health -
(2002)
Ethical considerations in protection of the environment from the effects of ionizing radiation. IAEA-TECDOC-1270 -
P. Slovic (1996)
Perception of Risk From RadiationRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 68
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- ISSN
- 2041-8396
- eISSN
- 2041-840X
- DOI
- 10.1002/wene.22
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Nuclear power generation require protection against harmful effects of ionizing radiation. Radiation protection is based on the linear, no‐threshold model of health risks at low doses and three fundamental principles: justification, optimization, and limitation. The practical application of radiation protection is divided into three areas: planned, emergency, and existing exposure situations. Planned exposure situations include difficult social issues related to the exposure of large populations, exposure of future generations, protection against accidents, and protection of the environment. Emergency and existing exposure situations are both characterized by heterogeneous distributions of exposures and complex social and economic aspects, which make assessment and evaluation of protective strategies complicated and value laden. Four problem areas of social and ethical issues stand out as central for radiation protection: The first is uncertainty and the influence of value judgments in scientific risk assessments. The second is distributions of risks and benefits between different individuals, both in space and time. The third is the problem of setting limits when there is no known level of exposure that is associated with a zero risk. The fourth central problem area is related to stakeholder influence and risk communication.
Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2012